Advertisement

Fast and Robust Clinical Triple-Region Image Segmentation Using One Level Set Function

  • Shuo Li
  • Thomas Fevens
  • Adam Krzyżak
  • Chao Jin
  • Song Li
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4191)

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel method for clinical triple-region image segmentation using a single level set function. Triple-region image segmentation finds wide application in the computer aided X-ray, CT, MRI and ultrasound image analysis and diagnosis. Usually multiple level set functions are used consecutively or simultaneously to segment triple-region medical images. These approaches are either time consuming or suffer from the convergence problems. With the new proposed triple-regions level set energy modelling, the triple-region segmentation is handled within the two region level set framework where only one single level set function needed. Since only a single level set function is used, the segmentation is much faster and more robust than using multiple level set functions. Adapted to the clinical setting, individual principal component analysis and a support vector machine classifier based clinical acceleration scheme are used to accelerate the segmentation. The clinical acceleration scheme takes the strengths of both machine learning and the level set method while limiting their weaknesses to achieve automatic and fast clinical segmentation. Both synthesized and practical images are used to test the proposed method. These results show that the proposed method is able to successfully segment the triple-region using a single level set function. Also this segmentation is very robust to the placement of initial contour. While still quickly converging to the final image, with the clinical acceleration scheme, our proposed method can be used during pre-processing for automatic computer aided diagnosis and surgery.

Keywords

Support Vector Machine Image Segmentation Initial Contour Medical Image Segmentation Geodesic Active Contour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    An, J.h., Chen, Y., Huang, F., Wilson, D.C., Geiser, E.A.: A Variational PDE Based Level Set Method for a Simultaneous Segmentation and Non-rigid Registration. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 286–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan, P., Kassim, A.A.: Mra image segmentation with capillary active contour. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 51–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao, H.-K., Chan, T.F., Merriman, B., Osher, S.: A variational level set approach to multiphase motion. Journal of Computational Physics 127(1), 179–195 (1996)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samson, C., Blanc-Fraud, L., Aubert, G., Zerubia, J.: A level set model for image classification. International Journal of Computer Vision 40(3), 187–197 (2000)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paragios, N., Deriche, R.: Coupled geodesic active regions for image segmentation: A level set approach. In: Vernon, D. (ed.) ECCV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1843, pp. 224–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vese, L., Chan, T.: A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. International Journal of Computer Vision 50(3), 271–293 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, S., Fevens, T., Krzyżak, A., Jin, C., Li, S.: Semi-automatic decay detection on dental x-rays using variational level set. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 670–678. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeon, M., Alexander, M., Pedrycz, W., Pizzi, N.: Unsupervised hierarchical image segmentation with level set and additive operator splitting. Pattern Recognition Letters 26, 1461–1469 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai, A., Yezzi, J.A., Willsky, A.: Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 10, 1169–1186 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, S., Fevens, T., Krzyżak, A.: Image segmentation adapted for clinical settings by combining pattern classification and level sets. In: Barillot, C., Haynor, D.R., Hellier, P. (eds.) MICCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3216, pp. 160–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, X., Chen, T., Kumar, B.V.K.V.: Face authentication for multiple subjects using eigenflow. Pattern Recognition 36(2), 313–328 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuo Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas Fevens
    • 2
  • Adam Krzyżak
    • 2
  • Chao Jin
    • 2
  • Song Li
    • 3
  1. 1.GE HealthcareLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Software EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontréalCanada
  3. 3.School of StomatologyAnhui Medical UniversityHefeiP.R. China

Personalised recommendations