Backward-Warping Ultrasound Reconstruction for Improving Diagnostic Value and Registration

  • Wolfgang Wein
  • Fabian Pache
  • Barbara Röper
  • Nassir Navab
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4191)


Freehand 3D ultrasound systems acquire sets of B-Mode ultrasound images tagged with position information obtained by a tracking device. For both further processing and clinical use of these ultrasound slice images scattered in space, it is often required to reconstruct them into 3D-rectilinear grid arrays. We propose new efficient methods for this so-called ultrasound spatial compounding using a backward-warping paradigm. They allow to establish 3D-volumes from any scattered freehand ultrasound data with superior quality / speed properties with respect to existing methods. In addition, arbitrary MPR slices can be reconstructed directly from the freehand ultrasound slice set, without the need of an extra volumetric reconstruction step. We qualitatively assess the reconstruction quality and quantitatively compare our compounding method to other algorithms using ultrasound data of the neck and liver. The usefulness of direct MPR reconstruction for multimodal image registration is demonstrated as well.


Ultrasound Image Target Registration Error Reconstruction Volume Ultrasound Data Multimodal Image Registration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Fenster, A., Downey, D.B., Cardinal, H.N.: Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology 46(5), R67–R99 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mercier, L., Langø, T., Lindseth, F., Collins, D.: A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 31, 449–471 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barry, C., Allott, C., John, N., Mellor, P., Arundel, P., Thomson, D., Waterton, J.: Three-dimensional freehand ultrasound: Image reconstruction and volume analysis. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 23, 1209–1224 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rohling, R., Gee, A., Berman, L.: Automatic registration of 3-D ultrasound images. Technical report, Cambridge University Engineering Department (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prager, R., Gee, A., Berman, L.: Stradx: Real-time acquisition and visualization of freehand three-dimensional ultrasound. Medical Image Analysis 3, 129–140 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coupe, P., Hellier, P., Azzabou, N., Barillot, C.: 3d freehand ultrasound reconstruction based on probe trajectory. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 597–604. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shepard, D.: A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data. In: Proc. 23 Nat. Conf. ACM, pp. 517–524 (1968)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wein, W., Röper, B., Navab, N.: Automatic registration and fusion of ultrasound with CT for radiotherapy. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Wein
    • 1
  • Fabian Pache
    • 1
  • Barbara Röper
    • 2
  • Nassir Navab
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP)TU MunichGarchingGermany
  2. 2.Clinic and Policlinic of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der IsarTU MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations