Cosmology Inspired Design of Biomimetic Tissue Engineering Templates with Gaussian Random Fields

  • Srinivasan Rajagopalan
  • Richard A. Robb
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4191)


Tissue engineering integrates the principles of engineering and life sciences toward the design, construction, modification and growth of biological substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue function. The structural integrity and ultimate functionality of such tissue analogs is defined by scaffolds- porous, three-dimensional "trellis-like" structures that, on implantation, provide a viable environment to regenerate damaged tissues. The orthogonal scaffold fabrication methods currently employed can be broadly classified into two categories: (a) conventional, irreproducible, stochastic techniques producing reasonably biomorphic scaffold architecture, and (b) rapidly emerging, repeatable, computer-controlled techniques producing straight edged "contra naturam" scaffold architecture. In this paper, we present the results of the first attempt in an image-based scaffold modeling and optimization strategy that synergistically exploits the orthogonal fabrication techniques to create repeatable, biomorphic scaffolds with optimal scaffold morphology. Motivated by the use of Gaussian random fields (GRF) to model cosmological structure formation, we use appropriately ordered and clipped stacks of GRF to model the three-dimensional pore-solid scaffold labyrinths. Image-based metrology, fabrication and mechanical characterization of these scaffolds reveal the possibility of enabling the previously elusive deployment of promising benchside tissue analogs to the clinical bedside.


Covariance Function Tissue Engineering Scaffold Dice Similarity Coefficient Gaussian Random Field Structure Model Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Yang, S., et al.: Design of scaffolds for use in Tissue Engineering: Part I Traditional Factors. Tissue Engineering 7(6), 679–689 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rajagopalan, S., Robb, R.: Schwarz meets Schwann: Design and fabrication of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 794–801. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spalazzi, J.P., et al.: Osteoblast and Chondrocyte interactions during coculture on scaffolds. IEEE Eng. Med. & Biol. 22(5), 27–34 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coles, P., Chiang, L.Y.: Characterizing the nonlinear growth of large-scale structure in the universe. Nature 406, 376–378 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiang, L., et al.: Return mapping of phases and the analysis of the gravitational clustering hierarchy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 488–494 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berger, J.O., et al.: Objective Bayesian analysis of spatially correlated data. J Am Stat Assoc 96(456), 1361–1374 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matern, B.: Spatial Variation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wackernagel, H.: Multivariate Geostatistics. Springer, Berlin (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yaglom, A.M.: Correlation theory of stationary and related random functions I. Basic results. Springer, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teubner, M.: Level surfaces of Gaussian random fields and microemulsions. Europhys Lett. 14, 403–408 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knackstedt, M.A., Robers, A.P.: Morphology and macroscopic properties of conducting polymer blends. Macromolecules 29, 1369–1371 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knackstedt, M.A., Robers, A.P.: Mechanical and transport properties of model foamed solids. J. Mater Sci Lett 14, 1357–1359 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Press, W., et al.: Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kozintsev, B.: Computations with Gaussian Random Fields, PhD Thesis, University of Maryland (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajagopalan, S., Robb, R.A.: Assessment of similarity indices to quantify segmentation accuracy of scaffold images for tissue engineering. In: Proc. SPIE, Medical Imaging, vol. 5747, pp. 1636–1647 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dice, L.R.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajagopalan, S., Karwoski, R., Robb, R.A.: Shape based interpolation of porous amd tortuous binary objects. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2488, pp. 957–958. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cima, L.G., et al.: Tissue engineering by cell transplantation using degradable polymer substrates. J. Biomech Eng. 113, 143–151 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajagopalan, S., Robb, R.A.: Image based metrology of porous tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Proc SPIE, Medical Imaging, vol. 6144, pp. 540–550 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramanujan, S., Pluen, A.: Diffusion and convection in collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium. J Biophys 83, 1650–1660 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karageorgiou, V., Kaplan, D.: Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26(27), 5474–5491 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srinivasan Rajagopalan
    • 1
  • Richard A. Robb
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Imaging ResourceMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations