Transformation Model and Constraints Cause Bias in Statistics on Deformation Fields

  • Torsten Rohlfing
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4190)


This work investigates the effects of nonrigid transformation model and deformation constraints on the results of deformation-based morphometry (DBM) studies. We evaluate three popular registration algorithms: a B-spline algorithm with several different constraint terms, Thirion’s demons algorithm, and a curvature PDE-based algorithm. All algorithms produced virtually identical overlaps of corresponding structures, but the underlying deformation fields were very different, and the Jacobian determinant values within homogeneous structures varied dramatically. In several cases, we observed bi-modal distributions of Jacobians within a region that violate the assumption of gaussianity that underlies many statistical tests. Our results demonstrate that, even with perfect overlap of corresponding structures, the statistics of Jacobian values are affected by bias due to design elements of the particular nonrigid registration. These findings are not limited to DBM, but also apply to voxel-based morphometry to the extent that it includes a Jacobian-based correction step (“modulation”).


Transformation Model Outer Sphere Registration Algorithm Image Force Nonrigid Registration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Ashburner, J., Hutton, C., Frackowiak, et al.: Identifying global anatomical differences: Deformation-based morphometry. Hum.Brain Map. 6(5–6), 348–357 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Csernansky, J.G., Joshi, S., Wang, L., et al.: Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95(19), 11406–11411 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaser, C., Volz, H.P., Kiebel, S., et al.: Detecting structural changes in whole brain based on nonlinear deformations — application to schizophrenia research. Neuro Image 10(2), 107–113 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen, D., Davatzikos, C.: Very high-resolution morphometry using mass-preserving deformations and HAMMER elastic registration. Neuro Image 18(1), 28–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung, M.K., Worsley, K.J., Paus, T., et al.: A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry. Neuro Image 14(3), 595–606 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., et al.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18(8), 712–721 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wahba, G.: Spline Models for Observational Data. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series, vol. 59. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rohlfing, T., Maurer Jr., C.R., Bluemke, D.A., et al.: Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22(6), 730–741 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thirion, J.P.: Fast non-rigid matching of 3D medical images. Technical Report 2547, INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, France (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bajcsy, R., Kovačič, S.: Multiresolution elastic matching. Comput. Vision. Graph. Image Processing 46(1), 1–21 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christensen, G.E., Rabbitt, R.D., Miller, M.I.: Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 5(10), 1435–1447 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischer, B., Modersitzki, J.: Curvature based image registration. J.Mathematical Imaging and Vision 18(1), 81–85 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashburner, J., Friston, K.J.: Voxel-based morphometry — the methods. NeuroImage 11(6), 805–821 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Good, C.D., Johnsrude, I.S., Ashburner, J., et al.: A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuro Image 14(1), 21–36 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torsten Rohlfing
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuroscience ProgramSRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations