Comparing the Similarity of Statistical Shape Models Using the Bhattacharya Metric
A variety of different methods of finding correspondences across sets of images to build statistical shape models have been proposed, each of which is likely to result in a different model. When dealing with large datasets (particularly in 3D), it is difficult to evaluate the quality of the resulting models. However, if the different methods are successfully modelling the true underlying shape variation, the resulting models should be similar. If two different techniques lead to similar models, it suggests that they are indeed approximating the true shape change. In this paper we explore a method of comparing statistical shape models by evaluating the Bhattacharya overlap between their implied shape distributions. We apply the technique to investigate the similarity of three models of the same 3D dataset constructed using different methods.
KeywordsSingular Value Decomposition Mesh Model Statistical Shape Model Connected Vertex Free Form Deformation
- 2.Rueckert, D., Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A.: Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using NRR. IEEE TMI 22, 1014–1025 (2003)Google Scholar
- 3.Cootes, T.F., et al.: ASMs - their training and application. CVIU 61, 38–59 (1995)Google Scholar
- 5.Crum, W.R., Camara, O., Rueckert, D., Bhatia, K.K., Jenkinson, M., Hill, D.L.G.: Generalised overlap measures for assessment of pairwise and groupwise image registration and segmentation. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 99–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Bhattacharya, A.: On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bulletin of Calcutta Maths Society 35, 99–110 (1943)Google Scholar
- 8.Cootes, T.F., Twining, C.J., Taylor, C.J.: Diffeomorphic statistical shape models. In: Proceedings of the 15th British Machine Vision Conference, Norwich, pp. 447–456 (2004)Google Scholar