Designing Digital Library Resources for Users in Sparse, Unbounded Social Networks

  • Richard Butterworth
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4172)

Abstract

Most digital library projects reported in the literature build resources for dense, bounded user groups, such as students or research groups in tertiary education. Having such highly interrelated and well defined user groups allows for digital library developers to use existing design methods to gather and implement requirements from those groups. This paper, however, looks at situations where digital library resources are aimed at much more sparse, ill defined networks of users. We report on a project which explicitly set out to ‘broaden access’ to tertiary education library resources to users not in higher education. In particular we discuss the problem of gathering á priori user requirements when by definition, we did not know who the users would be, we look at how disintermediation plays an even stronger negative role for sparse groups, and how we designed a system to replicate an intermediation role.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shen, R., Gonçcalves, M.A., Fan, W., Fox, E.: Requirements gathering and modeling of domain-sprecific digital libraries with the 5S framework: an archaeological case study with ETANA. In: [21], pp. 1–12Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Monroy, C., Furuta, R., Mallen, E.: Visualising and exploring picasso’s world. In: Marshall, C., Henry, G., Delcambre, L. (eds.) Proceedings of 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson, R., Landoni, M., Gibb, F.: Guidelines for designing electronic books. In: Agosti, M., Thanos, C. (eds.) ECDL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2458, p. 47. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wellman, B.: An electronic group is virtually a social network. In: Kiesler, S. (ed.) Culture of the internet, pp. 179–205. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.): Social structures: a network approach. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis Perkins, V., Butterworth, R., Curzon, P., Fields, B.: A study into the effect of digitisation projects on the management and stability of historic photograph collections. In: [21], pp. 278–289Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keil, M., et al.: A framework for identifying software project risks. Commun. ACM 41(11), 76–83 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGraw, K., Harbison, K.: User-centred requirements: the scenario based engineering process. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P.: Requirements engineering: a good practice guide. Wiley, Chichester (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hix, D., Hartson, H.R.: Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Human computer interaction, 3rd edn. Pearson, London (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boehm, B.: A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer 21(5), 61–72 (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu, E.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of RE-97: 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 226–235 (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Butterworth, R.: The Accessing our Archival and Manuscript Heritage project and the development of the ’Helpers’ website. Technical Report IDC-TR-2006-001, Interaction Design Centre, School of Computing Science, Middlesex University (2006), Available from http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/idc/tech_reports.html
  16. 16.
    Butterworth, R., Davis Perkins, V.: Assessing the roles that a small specialist library plays to guide the development of a hybrid digital library. In: Crestani, F., Ruthven, I. (eds.) CoLIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3507, pp. 200–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nardi, B.A., O’Day, V.: Information Ecologies. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borgman, C.: From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: access to information in the networked world. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vishik, C., Whinston, A.: Knowledge sharing, quality, and intermediation. In: WACC 1999: Proceedings of the international joint conference on Work activities coordination and collaboration, pp. 157–166. ACM Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Council on Archives: ISAD(G): General international standard archival description, 2nd edn. (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rauber, A., Christodoulakis, S., Min Tjoa, A. (eds.): Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 9th European Conference, ECDL 2005 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Butterworth
    • 1
  1. 1.Interaction Design Centre, School of Computing ScienceMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations