Building Digital Libraries for Scientific Data: An Exploratory Study of Data Practices in Habitat Ecology

  • Christine Borgman
  • Jillian C. Wallis
  • Noel Enyedy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4172)


As data become scientific capital, digital libraries of data become more valuable. To build good tools and services, it is necessary to understand scientists’ data practices. We report on an exploratory study of habitat ecologists and other participants in the Center for Embedded Networked Sensing. These scientists are more willing to share data already published than data that they plan to publish, and are more willing to share data from instruments than hand-collected data. Policy issues include responsibility to provide clean and reliable data, concerns for liability and misappropriation of data, ways to handle sensitive data about human subjects arising from technical studies, control of data, and rights of authorship. We address the implications of these findings for tools and architecture in support of digital data libraries.


Sensor Network Scientific Data Digital Library Habitat Ecology Data Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Atkins, D.E., et al.: Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon panel on Cyberinfrastructure. National Science Foundation, Washington (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Unsworth, J., et al.: Draft Report of the American Council of Learned Societies’ Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for Humanities and Social Sciences (Last visited November 5, 2005),
  3. 3.
    Berman, F., Brady, H.: Final Report: NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences (Last visited May 18, 2005),
  4. 4.
    Schroder, P.: Digital Research Data as Floating Capital of the Global Science System. In: Wouters, P., Schroder, P. (eds.) Promise and Practice in Data Sharing, pp. 7–12. NIWIKNAW, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hey, T., Trefethen, A.: The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective. In: Grid Computing – Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hey, T., Trefethen, A.: Cyberinfrastructure and e-Science. Science 308, 818–821 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Virtual Observatory Alliance (Last visited March 2, 2005),
  8. 8.
    Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (Last visited November 25, 2004),
  9. 9.
    Biomedical Informatics Research Network (Last visited March 19, 2005),
  10. 10.
    GEON (Last visited March 19, 2005),
  11. 11.
    Star, S.L.: The politics of formal representations: Wizards, gurus and organizational complexity. In: Star, S.L. (ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Estrin, D., Michener, W.K., Bonito, G.: Environmental cyberinfrastructure needs for distributed sensor networks: A report from a National Science Foundation sponsored workshop, Scripps Institute of Oceanography (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zimmerman, A.: New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, under reviewGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pritchard, S.M., Carver, L., Anand, S.: Collaboration for knowledge management and campus informatics. University of California, Santa Barbara (2004), Retrieved from (on November 14 2005)
  15. 15.
    Schnase, J.L., et al.: Building the next generation biological information infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Forum on Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World. National Academy Press, Washington (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michener, W.K., Brunt, J.W. (eds.): Ecological Data: Design, Management and Processing. Blackwell Science, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bowker, G.C.: Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science 30(5), 643–683 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown, C.: Lineage metadata standard for land parcels in colonial states. In: GIS/LIS 1995 Annual Conference and Exposition. American Soc. Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing & American Congress on Surveying & Mapping, Bethesda, MD, USA, Part 1, vol. 1, pp. 121–130 (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwa, C.: Local ecologies and global science: Discourses and strategies of the International Geospher-Biosphere Programme. Social Studies of Science 35(6), 923–950 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shankar, K.: Scientific data archiving: the state of the art in information, data, and metadata management (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sandoval, W.A., Reiser, B.J.: Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic supports for science inquiry. Science Education 87, 1–29 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Engeström, Y.: Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Perspectives on activity theory, pp. 19–38. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Engeström, Y.: Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki (1987)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cole, M., Engeström, Y. (eds.): A Cultural-historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cummings, J.N., Kiesler, S.: Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science 35(5), 703–722 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arzberger, P., et al.: An International Framework to Promote Access to Data. Science 303(5665), 1777–1778 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Borgman
    • 1
  • Jillian C. Wallis
    • 2
  • Noel Enyedy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information Studies, Graduate School of Education & Information StudiesUCLA 
  2. 2.Center for Embedded Networked SensingUCLA 
  3. 3.Department of Education, Graduate School of Education & Information StudiesUCLA 

Personalised recommendations