Visualizing Space-Based Interactions Among Distributed Agents: Environmental Planning at the Inner-City Scale

  • D. Borri
  • D. Camarda
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4101)


Since from the 1980s, computer science and artificial intelligence have focused on environmental planning, with high interest in analysing real and virtual cognitive agents at work. This is true for procedures, long-range planning, operational planning, as well as factors and scenarios of future events, future risks, multi-agent organisation, and resource-based planning.

This long-range, large-scale, strategy-driven interest has generally prevented short-term planning, low-scale and detailed planning from being explored with an intelligent-planning approach. This paper shows a case of small-scale innercity planning for environmental and development issues in an urban context, with a sustainably sound approach.

In this concern, a system architecture has been set up, to support the interaction of local social, economic, financial agents by a web-based geographic interface able to visualize, share, channel substantial information in the planning process with a space-based approach. The details of setup methodologies and results are analyzed, trying to find potentials and critical characters of a georeferenced cooperative work, particularly attentive to the role of spacebased cognitions and discourses in multi-agent interactions.


Cognitive Agent Environmental Planning Forum Cognition Participatory Scenario Forum Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barbanente, A., Monno, V.: Immagini Strategiche e Informazione Geografica per la Gestione Ambientale del Bacino dell’Ofanto. In: Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Informatics in Urban and Regional Plannig, Pisa, June 5-7 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (eds.): Language and Space (Language, Speech, and Communication). Bradford Books, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borri, D., Camarda, D., De Liddo, A.: Mobility in Environmental Planning: An Integrated Multi-agent Approach. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3675, pp. 119–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borri, D., Camarda, D., Grassini, L.: Distributed Knowledge in Environmental Planning: Hybrid IT-Based Approaches in Scenario-Building Contexts. Group Decision and Negotiation (2006) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borri, D.: Intelligent Learning Devices in Planning. In: Seminar on Computational Models in Design and Planning Support. Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London (September 2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borri, D., Camarda, D., De Liddo, A.: Envisioning Environmental Futures: Multi-Agent Knowledge Generation, Frame Problem, Cognitive Mapping. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3190, pp. 230–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damasio, A.: Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Harcourt, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forester, J.: The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friend, J., Hickling, A.: Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gardner, H.: Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. Basic Books (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kendon, A.: Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khakee, A.: Participatory Scenarios for Sustainable Development. Foresight 1, 229–240 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khakee, A., Barbanente, A., Camarda, D., Puglisi, M.: With or Without? Comparative Study of Preparing Participatory Scenarios Using Computer-Aided and Traditional Brainstorming. Journal of Future Research 6, 45–64 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maciocco, G. (ed.): Le Dimensioni Ambientali della Pianificazione Urbana. FrancoAngeli, Milano (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shanahan, M.: Solving the Frame Problem. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sillince, J.A.A., Saeedi, M.H.: Computer-Mediated Communication; Problems and Potentials of Argumentation Structures. Decision Support Systems 26, 287–306 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Borri
    • 1
  • D. Camarda
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Architettura e UrbanisticaPolitecnico di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations