Abstract
In the JFK paper we made the kind of throw away assertion, a very trivial assertion, that the reason that you can’t have identity protection for both parties in the presence of an active attack is that someone has to reveal their identity first, unless you know something about each other that’s secret in advance. Assuming certificates and so on is themeans for identification, someone has to identify first, you can’t say, I’ll only tell you who I am if you tell me who you are.
Now that was an assertion of a trivial fact rather than a proof. I’m wondering if you believe, under the assumptions we had, that that was true?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ylitalo, J. (2006). BLIND: A Complete Identity Protection Framework for End-Points (Transcript of Discussion). In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J.A., Roe, M. (eds) Security Protocols. Security Protocols 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3957. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11861386_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11861386_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40925-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40926-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)