Advertisement

Stability Analysis of Harvesting Strategies in a Cellular Automata Based Predator-Prey Model

  • Qiuwen Chen
  • Jingqiao Mao
  • Weifeng Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4173)

Abstract

The stability properties of different harvesting strategies are an important aspect of predator-prey system. Most of the previous studies applied a non-spatial approach such as Lotka-Volterra model. In this paper, a stochastic cellular automata based predator-prey model (EcoCA) was developed and verified by the classical Lotka-Volterra model. The EcoCA was then used to investigate the statistical stabilities of different harvesting strategies of the predator-prey complex. Four groups of numerical experiments have been conducted: (1) no harvesting, (2) harvesting prey only, (3) harvesting predator only and (4) harvesting prey and predator jointly. Two harvesting methods, constant quota versus constant effort, are examined for each group. The effects of harvesting criterion are studied as well, which imposes a limit of population density when execute a harvest. The simulation results showed that constant effort leads to statistically more stable behaviors than constant quota. The joint harvesting of prey and predator with a reasonable constant effort can improve system stability and increase the total yields. In addition, it once again confirmed that space places a significant role in the stability properties of the predation and harvesting system, which indicates the importance to use spatially explicit model in conservation ecology.

Keywords

Cellular Automaton Stability Property Explicit Model Phase Trajectory Space Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beddington, J.R., May, R.M.: Maximum Sustainable Yields in Systems Subject to Harvesting at More Than One Tropic Level. Mathematic Biosciences 15, 261–281 (1980)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azar, C., Holmberg, J., Lindgern, K.: Stability Analysis of Harvesting in a Predator-Prey Model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 174, 13–19 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beddington, J.R.: Mutual Interference between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency. Journal of Animal Ecology 51, 331–340 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brauer, F., Soudach, A.C.: Stability Region in Predator-Prey Systems with Constant Rate Prey Harvesting. Journal of Mathematic Biology 8, 55–71 (1979)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azar, C., Lindgern, K., Holmberg, J.: Constant Quota versus Constant Effort Harvesting. Environmental and Resource Economics 7, 193–196 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    May, R.M., Beddington, J.R., Clark, C.W., Holt, S.J., Laws, R.M.: Management of Multispecies Fisheries. Science 205, 267–277 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beddington, J.R., Cooke, J.G.: Harvesting from a Prey-Predator Complex. Ecological Modelling 14, 155–177 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costa Duarte, C.: Renewable Resource Market Obeying Difference Equations: Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos. Environmental and Resource Economics 4, 353–381 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jasen, V.A.A.: The Dynamics of Two Diffusively Coupled Predator-Prey Populations. Theoretical Population Biology 59, 119–131 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Q., Mynett, A.E.: Effects of Cell Size and Configuration in Cellular Automata Based Prey-Predator Modelling. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 11, 609–625 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nowak, M.A., Sasaki, A., Taylor, C., Fudenberg, D.: Emergence of Cooperation and Evolutionary Stability in Finite Populations. Nature 428, 646–650 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, Q.: Cellular Automata and Artificial Intelligence in Ecohydraulics Modeling. Taylor & Francis Group plc, London (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chopard, B., Droz, M.: Cellular automata modelling of physical systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirota, R., Iwao, M., Ramani, A., Takahashi, D., Grammaticos, B., Ohta, Y.: From Integrability to Chaos in a Lotka-Volterra Cellular Automaton. Physics Letters A 236, 39–44 (1997)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mynett, A.E., Chen, Q.: Cellular automata as a paradigm in ecological and ecohydraulics modeling. LNCS. Springer-Verlag Press, Germany (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson, J.M.T., Hunt, G.W.: Instabilities and Catastrophes in Science and Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, London (1982)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiuwen Chen
    • 1
  • Jingqiao Mao
    • 1
  • Weifeng Li
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Lab for System Ecology, Research Centre for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesChina

Personalised recommendations