Advertisement

Moving on from Weiser’s Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences

  • Yvonne Rogers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4206)

Abstract

A motivation behind much UbiComp research has been to make our lives convenient, comfortable and informed, following in the footsteps of Weiser’s calm computing vision. Three themes that have dominated are context awareness, ambient intelligence and monitoring/tracking. While these avenues of research have been fruitful their accomplishments do not match up to anything like Weiser’s world. This paper discusses why this is so and argues that is time for a change of direction in the field. An alternative agenda is outlined that focuses on engaging rather than calming people. Humans are very resourceful at exploiting their environments and extending their capabilities using existing strategies and tools. I describe how pervasive technologies can be added to the mix, outlining three areas of practice where there is much potential for professionals and laypeople alike to combine, adapt and use them in creative and constructive ways.

Keywords

calm computing Weiser user experiences engaged living Ubi- Comp history pervasive technologies proactive computing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abowd, G.D., Mynatt, E.D.: Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 29–58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, K., Dourish, P.: Situated Privacies: Do you know where you mother [trucker] is? In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, July 22-27 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arroyo, E., Bonnanni, L., Selker, T.: WaterBot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In: CHI Proceedings, pp. 631–639. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashley, S.: Cognitive Radio, Scientific American, 67–73 (March 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Augmented Cognition International Society (retrieved, March 30, 2006), http://www.augmentedcognition.org/
  6. 6.
    Beckwith, R., Lederer, S.: Designing for one’s dotage: UbiComp and Residential Care facilities. In: Conference on the Networked Home and the Home of the Future (HOIT 2003), Irvine, CA (April 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bell, M., Chalmers, M., Barkhuus, L., Hall, M., Sherwood, S., Tennent, P., Brown, B., Rowland, D., Benford, S., Hampshire, A., Captra, M.: Interweaving mobile games with everyday life. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006, Conference on Human Factors in Computing, pp. 417–426. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, K., Grinter, R., Henderson, A., Lopes, C.: Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp. 415–422. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benford, S., Schnädelbach, H., Koleva, B., Anastasi, R., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., Green, J., Ghali, A., Pridmore, T., Gaver, B., Boucher, A., Walker, B., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Gellersen, H., Steed, A.: Expected, sensed, and desired: A framework for designing sensing-based interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 3–30 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruner, J.S.: The Relevance of Education. Harmondsworth, Middlesex (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burrell, J., Brooke, T., Beckwith, R.: Vineyard Computing: Sensor Networks in agricultural production. Pervasive Computing 3(1), 38–45 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chalmers, D., Chalmers, M., Crowcroft, J., Kwiatkowska, M., Milner, R., O’Neill, E., Rodden, T., Sassone, V., Sloman, M.: Ubiquitous Computing: Experience, design and science. Version 4 (retrieved, March 30, 2006), http://www-dse.doc.ic.ac.uk/Projects/UbiNet/GC/index.html
  13. 13.
    Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., Shelton, B., LaMarca, A., Schilit, B., Bly, S.: Technology for care networks for elders. Pervasive Computing 3, 22–29 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Digiens@U-City.: Korea moves into ubiquitous mode (retrieved, March 30, 2006), http://digiens.blogspot.com/2005/08/korea-moves-into-ubiquitous-mode.html
  15. 15.
    Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundation of embodied interaction. MIT, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dourish, P., Grinter, B., Delgado de la Flor, J., Joseph, M.: Security in the wild: user strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(6), 391–401 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., Kirk, D.: Savannah: mobile gaming and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 399–409 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Fransisco (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellersen, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N., Walker, B.: The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In: Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 885–900 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenfield, A.: Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New Riders, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Intel Research at Intel: Research Seattle (retrieved, March 20, 2006), http://www.intel.com/research/network/seattle_collab.htm
  22. 22.
    Intille, S., Larson, K., Beaudin, J., Nawyn, J., Munguia Tapia, E., Kaushik, P.: A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies. In: Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 1941–1944 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Intille, S.S., Bao, L., Munguia Tapia, E., Rondoni, J.: Acquiring in situ training data for context-aware ubiquitous computing applications. In: Proceedings CHI, pp. 1–8 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang, X., Chen, N.Y., Hong, J.I., Wang, K., Takayama, L., Landay, J.A.: Siren: Context-aware Computing for Firefighting. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 87–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Intelligence (retrieved, March 20, 2006), http://www.aspbs.com/juci.html
  26. 26.
    Kindberg, T., Fox, A.: System Software for Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1(1), 70–81 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klopfer, E., Squire, K.: Environmental Detectives – The Development of an Augmented Reality Platform for Environmental Simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krikke, J.: T-Engine: Japan’s Ubiquitous Computing Architecture is ready for prime time. Pervasive Computing, 4–9 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    LaMarca, A., Chawathe, Y., Consolvo, S., Hightower, J., Smith, I., Scott, J., Sohn, T., Howard, J., Hughes, J., Potter, F., Tabert, J., Powledge, P., Borriello, G., Schilit, B.: Place Lab: Device Positioning Using Radio Beacons in the Wild, Intel. Research, IRS-TR-04-016 (2004), http://placelab.org/publications/pubs/IRS-TR-04-016.pdf
  30. 30.
    Marmasse, N., Schmandt, C.: Location-aware information delivery with commotion. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen, H.-W. (eds.) HUC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1927, pp. 157–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Microsoft 2020 Science (retrieved, March 30, 2006), http://research.microsoft.com/towards2020science/
  32. 32.
    Moher, T.: Embedded Phenomena: Supporting science learning with classroom-sized-distribution simulations. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moher, T., Hussain, S., Halter, T., Kilb, D.: RoomQuake: embedding dynamic phenomena within the physical space of an elementary school classroom. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1655–1668. ACM Press, New York (2005) (extended Abstracts)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mynatt, E., Melenhorst, A., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.: Aware technologies for aging in place: Understanding user needs and attitudes. Pervasive Computing, 36–41 (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Price, S., Rogers, Y.: Let’s get physical: the learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Journal of Computers and Education 43, 137–151 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rogers, Y., Muller, H.: A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(1), 1–15 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rogers, Y., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., Randell, C., Muller, H., O’Malley, C., Stanton, D., Thompson, M., Weal, M.: Ambient Wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In: Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Harris, E., Phelps, T., Price, S., Smith, H., Muller, H., Randall, C., Moss, A., Taylor, I., Stanton, D., O’Malley, C., Corke, G., Gabrielli, S.: Things aren’t what they seem to be: innovation through technology inspiration. In: Proceedings of DIS 2002 Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 373–379. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ross, D.A.: Cyber Crumbs for successful aging with vision loss. Pervasive Computing 3, 30–35 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salvador, T., Anderson, K.: Practical Considerations of Context for Context Based Systems: An Example from an Ethnographic Case Study of a Man Diagnosed with Early On-set Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 243–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seely Brown, J.: Ubiquitous Computing and beyond – an emerging new common sense model (retrieved, March 20, 2006), http://www.johnseelybrown.com/JSB.pdf
  42. 42.
    Stirling, B.: Without Vision, the People Perish. In: Speech Given at CRA Conference on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering, Airlie House, Warrenton, Virginia, June 23 (2002) (retrieved, March 20, 2006), www.cra.org/Activities/grand.challenges/sterling.html
  43. 43.
    Tennenhouse, D.L.: Proactive Computing. Communications of the ACM 43(5), 43–50 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S., Gandhi, M.: Chick Clique: Persuasive Technology to Motivate Teenage Girls to Exercise. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factor in Computing Systems, pp. 1873–1878. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tran, Q., Calcaterra, G., Mynatt, E.: Cook’s Collage: Deja Vu Display for a Home Kitchen. In: Proceedings of HOIT 2005, pp. 15–32 (2005)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weiser, M., Brown, J.S.: The coming age of calm technology (1996) (retrieved, March 20, 2006), www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/acmfuture2endnote.htm
  47. 47.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century, Scientific American, 94–104 (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvonne Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.School of InformaticsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations