Advertisement

Principles of Smart Home Control

  • Scott Davidoff
  • Min Kyung Lee
  • Charles Yiu
  • John Zimmerman
  • Anind K. Dey
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4206)

Abstract

Seeking to be sensitive to users, smart home researchers have focused on the concept of control. They attempt to allow users to gain control over their lives by framing the problem as one of end-user programming. But families are not users as we typically conceive them, and a large body of ethnographic research shows how their activities and routines do not map well to programming tasks. End-user programming ultimately provides control of devices. But families want more control of their lives. In this paper, we explore this disconnect. Using grounded contextual fieldwork with dual-income families, we describe the control that families want, and suggest seven design principles that will help end-user programming systems deliver that control.

Keywords

Ubiquitous Computing Smart Home Family Identity Programming Task Enrichment Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barkhuus, L., Dey, A.K.: Is context-aware computing taking control away from the user? Three levels of interactivity examined. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 159–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnett, R.C.: Home-to-work spillover revisited: A study of full-time employed women in dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family 56, 647–656 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beech, S., Geelhoed, E., Murphy, R., Parker, J., Sellen, A., Shaw, K.: Lifestyles of working parents: Implications and opportunities for new technologies, HP Tech report HPL-2003-88 (R.1) (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belk, R.W.: Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2), 139–168 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E., Henderson, A., Lopes, C.: Making sense of sensing systems: Five questions for designers and researchers. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp. 415–422 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellotti, V., Edwards, W.K.: Intelligibility and accountability: Human consid-erations in context-aware systems. Human-Computer Interaction 16(2-4), 193–212 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernheim Brush, A.J., Combs Turner, T.: A Survey of personal and household scheduling. In: Proceedings of Group 2005, pp. 330–331 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blackwell, A.F., Burnett, M.F., Peyton Jones, S.: Champagne prototyping: A Re-search technique for early evaluation of complex end-user programming systems. In: Proceedings of VLHCC 2004, pp. 47–54 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cherlin, A.J.: The Changing American family and public policy. Urban Institute Press, Washington (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cook, D.J., Youngblood, M., Heierman, E., Gopalratnam, K., Rao, S., Litvin, A., Khawaja, F.: MavHome: An agent-based smart home. In: Proceedings of PerCom 2003, pp. 521–524 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cowan, R.S.: More Work for Mother. Free Association Books, London (1989)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Hemmings, T., Benford, S.: Finding a place for ubiComp in the home. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 208–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Darrah, C.N., English-Lueck, J.A.: Living in the eye of the storm: controlling the maelstrom in Silicon Valley. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Work and Family: Expanding the Horizons Conference (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darrah, C.N., English-Lueck, J., Freeman, J.: Families at work: An ethnography of dual career families. Report for the Sloane Foundation (Grant Number 98-6-21) (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darrah, C.N.: Family models, model families. In: Proceedings of the 2003 American Anthropological Association Annual Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davidoff, S., Lee, M.K., Zimmerman, J., Dey, A.K.: Socially-aware requirements for a smart home. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp. 41–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dey, A., Abowd, G., Salber, D.: A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction 16(2-4) (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dey, A.K., Hamid, R., Beckmann, C., Li, I., Hsu, D.: a CAPpella: programming by demonstration of context-aware applications. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004, pp. 33–40 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dey, A.K., Sohn, T., Streng, S., Kodama, J.: iCAP: Interactive prototyping of context-aware applications. In: Fishkin, K.P., Schiele, B., Nixon, P., Quigley, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3968, pp. 254–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dey, A.K., Newberger, A.N., Chau, E.: Support for context monitoring and control (submission, 2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dourish, P.: What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(1), 19–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dittmar, H.: Gender identity-related meanings of personal possessions. British Journal of Social Psychology 28(6), 159–171 (1989)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elliot, K., Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S.: Time, ownership and awareness: The value of contextual locations in the home. In: Beigl, M., Intille, S.S., Rekimoto, J., Tokuda, H. (eds.) UbiComp 2005. LNCS, vol. 3660, pp. 251–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fleuriot, C.: An Investigation into the management of time in complex lifestyles, Ph.D. thesis, University of the West of England (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frissen, V.A.J.: ICTs in the rush hour of life. The Information Society 16, 65–75 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gajos, K., Fox, H., Shrobe, H.: End user empowerment in human centered pervasive computing. In: Mattern, F., Naghshineh, M. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2414, pp. 1–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs (1967)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E.: Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6(1), 21–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grinter, R.E., Edwards, W.K.: At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, pp. 256–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harper, R.: Inside the smart home: Ideas, possibilities and methods. In: Harper, R. (ed.) Inside the smart home, pp. 1–14. Springer, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hayghe, H.V.: Children in 2 worker families and real family income. In Bureau of Labor and Statistics’ Monthly Labor Review 112(12), 48–52 (1989)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hindus, D.: The importance of homes in technology research. In: Proceedings of CoBuild 1999, pp. 199–207 (1999)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Humble, J., Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Åkesson, K., Koleva, B., Rodden, T.: “Playing with the bits”: User-configuration of ubiquitous domestic environments. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 256–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jahnke, J.H., d’Entremont, M., Stier, J.: Facilitating the programming of the smart home. IEEE Wireless Communications 9(6), 70–76 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kidd, C., Orr, R.J., Abowd, G.D., Atkeson, C., Essa, I., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T., Newstetter, W.: The Aware Home: A living laboratory for ubiqui-tous computing research. In: Streitz, N.A., Hartkopf, V. (eds.) CoBuild 1999. LNCS, vol. 1670, pp. 191–198. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kleine, R.E., Kleine, S.S., Kernan, J.B.: Mundane consumption and the self: A social identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 2(3), 209–235 (1993)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McCalley, L.T., Midden, C.J.H., Haagdorens, K.: Computing systems for household energy conservation: Consumer response and social ecological considerations. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005 Workshop on Social Implications of Ubiquitous Computing (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mozer, M.: The neural network house. In: Proceedings of AAAI Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp. 110–114 (1998)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Newman, M., Sedivy, J.Z., Neuwirth, C.M., Edwards, W.K., Hong, J.I., Izadi, S., Marcelo, K., Smith, T.F.: Designing for serendipity: Supporting end-user configuration of ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proceedings of DIS 2002, pp. 147–156 (2002)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nippert-Eng, C.: Home and work. Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rode, J.A., Toye, E.F., Blackwell, A.F.: The domestic economy: A broader unit of analysis for end user programming. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, pp. 1757–1760 (2005)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shackel, B.: Usability – context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In: Shackel, B., Richardson, S. (eds.) Human Factors for Informatics Usability, pp. 21–37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taylor, A.S., Swan, L.: Artful systems in the home. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, pp. 641–650 (2005)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tolmie, P., Pycock, J., Diggins, T., MacLean, A., Karsenty, A.: Unremarkable computing. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp. 399–406 (2002)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Truong, K.N., Huang, E.M., Abowd, G.D.: CAMP: A magnetic poetry interface for end-user programming of capture applications for the home. In: Davies, N., Mynatt, E.D., Siio, I. (eds.) UbiComp 2004. LNCS, vol. 3205, pp. 143–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Venkatesh, A., Chuan-Fong, E.S., Stolzoff, N.C.: A Longitudinal analysis of computing in the home based on census data 1984-1997. In: Proceedings of HOIT 2000, pp. 205–215 (2000)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265(3), 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Davidoff
    • 1
  • Min Kyung Lee
    • 1
  • Charles Yiu
    • 1
  • John Zimmerman
    • 1
  • Anind K. Dey
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction Institute + School of DesignCarnegie Mellon University 

Personalised recommendations