Segmenting Motifs in Protein-Protein Interface Surfaces

  • Jeff M. Phillips
  • Johannes Rudolph
  • Pankaj K. Agarwal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4175)


Protein-protein interactions form the basis for many intercellular events. In this paper we develop a tool for understanding the structure of these interactions. Specifically, we define a method for identifying a set of structural motifs on protein-protein interface surfaces. These motifs are secondary structures, akin to α-helices and β-sheets in protein structure; they describe how multiple residues form knob-into-hole features across the interface. These motifs are generated entirely from geometric properties and are easily annotated with additional biological data. We point to the use of these motifs in analyzing hotspot residues.


Interface Surface Interior Vertex Protein Interface Large Motif Watershed Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Agarwal, P.K., Edelsbrunner, H., Harer, J., Wang, Y.: Extreme elevation on 2-manifold. In: Proc. 20th ACM Symp. on Computational Geometry SoCG 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ban, Y.-E.A., Brown, P.L., Edelsbrunner, H., Headd, J.J., Rudolph, J.: MAPS: Protein docking interfaces (May 2006),
  3. 3.
    Ban, Y.-E.A., Edelsbrunner, H., Rudolph, J.: Interface Surface for Protein-Protein Complexes. J. ACM (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogan, A.A., Thorn, K.S.: Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. of Molecular Biology 280, 1–9 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chua, C.S., Jarvis, R.: Point signatures: A new representation for 3d object recognition. Int’l J. of Computer Vision 25(1), 63–85 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Connolly, M.L.: Shape complementarity at the hemoglobin α 1 β 1 subunit interface. Biopolymers 25(7), 1229–1247 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    do Carmo, M.P.: Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1976)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guerois, R., Nielsen, J.E., Serrano, L.: Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. of Molecular Biology 320, 369–387 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huo, S., Massova, I., Kollman, P.A.: Computational alanine scanning of the 1:1 human growth hormone-receptor complex. J. of Computational Chemistry 23, 15–27 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, S., Thornton, J.M.: Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. of Molecular Biology 272, 121–132 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kortemme, T., Baker, D.: A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. National Academy of Science USA 99, 14116–14121 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lo Conte, L., Chothia, C., Janin, J.: The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. of Molecular Biology 285, 2177–2198 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition and local scale-invariant features. In: Proc. 7th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Computer Vision ICPV 1999, vol. 2, pp. 1150–1157 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Massova, I., Kollman, P.A.: Computational alanine scanning to probe protein-protein interactions: A novel approach to evaluate binding free energies. J. of the American Chemical Society 121, 8133–8143 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyer, M., Desbrun, M., Schröder, P., Barr, A.H.: Discrete differential-geometry operators for triangulated 2-manifolds. Visualization and Mathematics III (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schreiber, G., Fersht, A.R.: Energetics of protein-protein interactions: Analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutation cycles. J. of Molecular Biology 248, 478–486 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vincent, L., Soille, P.: Watersheds in digital spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13(6), 583–598 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Y., Agarwal, P.K., Brown, P., Edelsbrunner, H., Rudolph, J.: Coarse and reliable geometric alignment for protein docking. In: 10th Pacific Symp. on Biocomputing PSB 2005, pp. 64–75 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, Y., Peterson, B.S., Staib, L.H.: 3d brain surface matching based on geodesics and local geometry. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 89, 252–271 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu, D., Tsai, C.-J., Nussinov, R.: Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. Protein Engineering 10(9), 999–1012 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff M. Phillips
    • 1
  • Johannes Rudolph
    • 2
  • Pankaj K. Agarwal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceDuke University 
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryDuke University 

Personalised recommendations