Interactive Multi-view Video Delivery with View-Point Tracking and Fast Stream Switching

  • Engin Kurutepe
  • M. Reha Civanlar
  • A. Murat Tekalp
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4105)


We present a 3-D Multi-view video delivery system where each user receives only the streams required for rendering their viewpoint. This paper proposes a novel method to alleviate adverse effects of the unavoidable delay between the time a client requests a new stream and the time it becomes available. To this effect, lower bit-rate versions of a set of adjacent views are also streamed to the viewer in addition to the currently required views. This ensures that the viewer has a low quality version of a view ready and decodable when an unpredicted viewpoint change occurs until the high quality stream arrives. Bandwidth implications and PSNR improvements are reported for various low quality streams encoded at different bit-rates. Performance comparisons of the proposed system with respect to transmitting all views using MVC and only two views with no low quality neighbors are presented.


Bandwidth Cost Image Base Rendering Stereo Video Decode Delay Plenoptic Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Levoy, M., Hanrahan, P.: Light field rendering. In: SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 31–42. ACM Press, New York, USA (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adelson, E.H., Bergen, J.R.: The Plenoptic Function and the Elements of Early Vision, pp. 3–20. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kang, S.B., Szeliski, R., Anandan, P.: The geometry-image representation tradeoff for rendering. In: Proc. International Conference on Image Proc. vol. 2, pp. 13–16 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mueller, K., Merkle, P., Schwarz, H., Hinz, T., Smolic, A., Oelbaum, T., Wiegand, T.: Multi-view video coding based on H.264/AVC using hierarchical b-frames. In: Picture Coding Symposium (PCS) (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurutepe, E., Civanlar, M.R., Tekalp, A.M.: A receiver-driven multicasting framework for 3DTV transmission. In: Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurutepe, E., Civanlar, M.R., Tekalp, A.M.: Interactive transport of multi-view videos for 3DTV applications. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 7, 830–836 (2006)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stelmach, L., Tam, W., Meegan, D., Vincent, A.: Stereo image quality: effects of mixed spatio-temporal resolution. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 10, 188–193 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aksay, A., Bilen, C., Kurutepe, E., Ozcelebi, T., Akar, G.B., Civanlar, M.R., Tekalp, A.M.: Temporal and spatial scaling for stereoscopic video compression. In: EUSIPCO 2006, EURASIP (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Engin Kurutepe
    • 1
  • M. Reha Civanlar
    • 1
  • A. Murat Tekalp
    • 1
  1. 1.Koc UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations