Skip to main content

Utilizing Independence of Multimodal Biometric Matchers

  • Conference paper
Multimedia Content Representation, Classification and Security (MRCS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4105))

Abstract

The problem of combining biometric matchers for person verification can be viewed as a pattern classification problem, and any trainable pattern classification algorithm can be used for score combination. But biometric matchers of different modalities possess a property of the statistical independence of their output scores. In this work we investigate if utilizing this independence knowledge results in the improvement of the combination algorithm. We show both theoretically and experimentally that utilizing independence provides better approximation of score density functions, and results in combination improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain, A., Hong, L., Kulkarni, Y.: A multimodal biometric system using fingerprint, face and speech. In: AVBPA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hardle, W.: Smoothing Techniques with Implementation in S. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tulyakov, S., Govindaraju, V.: Using independence assumption to improve multimodal biometric fusion. In: Oza, N.C., Polikar, R., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3541, pp. 147–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverman, B.W.: Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Beardah, C.C., Baxter, M.: The archaeological use of kernel density estimates. Internet Archaeology (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duin, R., Juszczak, P., Paclik, P., Pekalska, E., Ridder, D.d., Tax, D.: Prtools4, a matlab toolbox for pattern recognition (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. NIST: Biometric scores set (2004), http://www.nist.gov/biometricscores/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tulyakov, S., Govindaraju, V. (2006). Utilizing Independence of Multimodal Biometric Matchers. In: Gunsel, B., Jain, A.K., Tekalp, A.M., Sankur, B. (eds) Multimedia Content Representation, Classification and Security. MRCS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11848035_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11848035_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39393-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics