Advertisement

A Dissonant Frequency Filtering for Enhanced Clarity of Husky Voice Signals

  • Sangki Kang
  • Yongserk Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4188)

Abstract

In general, added noise in clean signal reduces intelligibility and degrades the performance of speech processing algorithms used for the applications such as speech compression and recognition. In this paper, a new voice clarity enhancing method using a dissonant frequency filtering (DFF) (especially C # and F # in each octave band when reference frequency is C) combined with noise suppression (NS) is proposed. The proposed method targets for speakers whose intelligibility became worse than normal under both noisy and noiseless environments.

The test results indicate that the proposed method provides a significant audible improvement for speakers whose intelligibility is impaired and especially for the speech contaminated by the colored noise. Therefore when the filter is employed as a pre-filter for enhancing the clarity of husky voice where several types of noises are also exploited, the output speech quality and clarity can be greatly enhanced.

Keywords

Colored Noise Noise Suppression Speech Enhancement Octave Band Adaptive Noise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boll, S.F.: Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-29, 113–120 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lim, J.S., Oppenheim, A.V.: All-pole modeling of degraded speech. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-26, 197–210 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansen, J., Clements, M.: Constrained iterative speech enhancement with application to speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-39(4), 21–27 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samber, M.R.: Adaptive noise canceling for speech signals. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-26, 419–423 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim, J.S., Oppenheim, A.V., Braida, L.D.: Evaluation of an adaptive comb filtering method for enhancing speech degraded by white noise addition. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-26(4), 354–358 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boll, S.F., Pulsipher, D.C.: Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using two microphone adaptive noise cancelation. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing ASSP-28(6), 752–753 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ephraim, Y.: Statistical-model-based speech enhancement systems. Proc. of IEEE 80(10), 1526–1555 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hee-Suk, P., SeongJoon, B., Koeng-Mo, S.: Improved fundamental frequency estimation using parametric cubic convolution. IEICE Trans. Fundamentals E83-A(12), 2747–2750 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    TIA/EIA/IS-127: Enhanced variable rate codec, speech service option 3 for wideband spread spectrum digital systems (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tennenbaum, J.: The foundations of scientific Musical Tunning. FIDELIO Magazine 1(1) (1991–1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howard, D.M., Angus, J.: Acoustics and Psychoacoustics. Focal Press (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sangki Kang
    • 1
  • Yongserk Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.SW Lab., Telecommunication R&D Center, Telecommunication Network Business, Samsung Electronics Co.Korea

Personalised recommendations