Advertisement

An Evolutionary Approach to Shimming Undulator Magnets for Synchrotron Radiation Sources

  • Olga Rudenko
  • Oleg Chubar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4193)

Abstract

Undulator magnets shimming is a stage of the undulator production cycle that has a major influence on the quality of a synchrotron radiation. Despite the high complexity of the underlying decision making process, shimming is traditionally performed in a semi-empirical way using a high level expert knowledge. Such a labor intensive approach introduces additional cost and delay in undulator production. The present study introduces an automated decision making procedure for shimming based on an appropriate formalization of this task. Our approach consists in formulating the corresponding constrained optimization problem, which can be efficiently solved by an evolutionary algorithm using 3D magnetostatic methods and magnetic measurement for fitness calculation. Such automation allows us to reduce the time and cost of the undulator production and it leads to results of a quality level that is hardly attainable empirically considering the high complexity of the optimization problem.

Keywords

Synchrotron Radiation Variation Operator Synchrotron Radiation Source Constraint Handling Electron Trajectory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chavanne, J., Elleaume, P.: Undulator and Wiggler Shimming. Synchrotron Radiation News 8(1), 18–22 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chubar, O., Elleaume, P., Chavanne, J.: A 3D Magnetostatics Computer Code for Insertion Devices. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 5, 481–484 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley, Chichester (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elleaume, P.: Undulator Radiation. In: Onuki, H., Elleaume, P. (eds.) Undulators, Wigglers and their Applications, Taylor and Francis, Abington (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holland, J.H.: Outline for a logical theory of adaptive systems. Journal of the association of computing machinery 3, 297–314 (1962)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joines, J.A., Houck, C.R.: On the Use of Non-Stationary Penalty Functions to Solve Nonlinear Constrained Optimization Problems With GAs. In: Michalewicz, Z., et al. (eds.) ICEC 1994 proceedings, pp. 579–584. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sasaki, S.: Analyses for a planar variably-polarizing undulator. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A347, 83–86 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenauer, M., Xanthakis, S.: Constrained GA Optimization. In: Forrest, S. (ed.) ICGA 1993 proceedings, pp. 573–580. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Rudenko
    • 1
  • Oleg Chubar
    • 1
  1. 1.Synchrotron Soleil, L’orme des Merisiers – Saint-AubinGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations