Advertisement

Biological Actuators Are Not Just Springs

Investigating Muscle Dynamics and Control Signals
  • Thomas Buehrmann
  • Ezequiel Di Paolo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4095)

Abstract

While there is a trend in current robotics towards more biologically inspired actuators, most work emphasizes the elastic property of muscles and tendons. Although elasticity plays a major role in many forms of movements, particularly walking and running, other features of animal muscles might also affect or even dominate movement dynamics. In this paper we use the Hill-type muscle model, common in biomechanics, to investigate the relationship between muscle dynamics and control signals in simple goal-directed movements. We find that the various non-linearities of the model lead to desirable properties with regard to controllability, such as increased stability and robustness to noise, independence of position and stiffness, or near linearity in search space. We conclude that in our attempt to create robots exhibiting the same flexibility and robustness as animals we have to seek a balance between the complexity of actuators and the extent to which their natural dynamics can be exploited in a given task.

Keywords

Control Signal Joint Position Muscle Model Interaction Torque Antagonistic Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bar-Cohen, Y.: Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles - Reality, Potential and Challenges, vol. PM98. SPIE Press, San Jose (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feldman, A., Ostry, D., et al.: Recent tests of the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model). MotorControl 2, 189–205 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garner, B.A., Pandy, M.G.: Estimation of Musculotendon Properties in the Human Upper Limb. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31(2), 207–220 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gribble, P.L., Ostry, D.J., Sanguineti, V., Laboissiere, R.: Are Complex Control Signals Required for Human Arm Movement? J. Neurophysiology 79, 1409–1424 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, I.E., Loeb, G.E.: A reductionist approach to creating and using neuromusculoskeletal models. In: Winters, J.M., Crago, P.E. (eds.) Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement. Springer, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murray, W.M., Buchanan, T.S., et al.: The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. Journal of Biomechanics 33(8), 943–952 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfeifer, R., Iida, F.: Morphological computation: Connecting body, brain and environment. Japanese Scientific Monthly 58(2), 48–54 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfeifer, R.: Building ‘fungus eaters’: Design principles of autonomous agents. In: Maes, P., Mataric, M.J., Meyer, J.A., Pollack, J., Wilson, S.W. (eds.) From Animals to Animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pratt, J.E., Krupp, B.T.: Series Elastic Actuators for Legged Robots. SPIE, San Jose (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verrelst, B., et al.: The pneumatic biped ‘lucy’ actuated with pleated pneumatic artificial muscles. Autonomous Robots 18, 201–213 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wagner, H., Blickhan, R.: Stabilizing function of skeletal muscles: an analytical investigation. J. Theor. Biol. 199, 163–179 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zajac, F.E.: Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. CRC Crit. Revs. biomed. Engng. 17, 359–411 (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Buehrmann
    • 1
  • Ezequiel Di Paolo
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics (CCNR), Department of InformaticsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations