Advertisement

Integration of an Autonomous Artificial Agent in an Insect Society: Experimental Validation

  • Grégory Sempo
  • Stéphanie Depickère
  • Jean-Marc Amé
  • Claire Detrain
  • José Halloy
  • Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4095)

Abstract

In mixed societies of robots and cockroaches, several insect-like-robot (Insbot) and animals interact in order to perform collective decision-making. Many gregarious species are able to collectively select a resting site without any leadership. The key process is based on the modulation of the probability of leaving the shelter according to the total population under this shelter and its light intensity. It is important that cockroaches perceive the robot as a “congener”. This recognition is mainly based on a chemical blend. The aim of this study is to validate experimentally (1) the behavioral patterns expressed by the cockroaches in presence of shelters and of an Insbot, and (2) the important role played by the chemical blend on collective decision-makings.

Keywords

Artificial Agent Collective Decision Cuticular Hydrocarbon Insect Society Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Colot, A., Caprari, G., Siegwart, R.: InsBot: Design of an Autonomous Mini Mobile Robot Able to Interact with Cockroaches. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, pp. 2418–2423 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    LEURRE Project official website, http://leurre.ulb.ac.be
  3. 3.
    Ishii, H., Nakasuji, M., Ogura, M., Miwa, H., Takanishi, A.: Accelerating Rat’s Learning Speed Using a Robot - The robot autonomously shows rats its functions. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communicaiton, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kubinyi, E., Miklósi, A., Kaplan, F., Gacsi, M., Topal, J., Cs anyi, V.: Can a dog tell the difference? dogs encounter AIBO, an animal-like robot in two social situations. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior on From animals to animats. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler, Z., Corke, P., Peterson, R., Rus, D.: Virtual fences for controlling cows. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, April 2004, pp. 4429–4436 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vaughan, R., Sumpter, N., Henderson, J., Frost, A., Cameron, S.: Experiments in automatic flock control. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 31, 109–117 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ame, J.M., Rivault, C., Deneubourg, J.L.: Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition. Anim. Behav. 68, 793–801 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeanson, R., Rivault, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Blancos, S., Fournier, R., Jost, C., Theraulaz, G.: Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Anim. Behav. 69, 169–180 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saffre, F., Halloy, J., Deneubourg, J.-L.: The Ecology of the Grid. In: Second International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 2005), pp. 378–379 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saïd, I., Costagliola, G., Leoncini, I., Rivault, C.: Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles and aggregation in four Periplaneta species (Insecta: Dictyoptera). J. Insect. Physiol. 51, 995–1003 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leoncini, I., Rivault, C.: Could species segregation be a consequence of aggregation processes. Example of Periplaneta americana (L.) and P. fuliginosa. Ethology 111, 527–540 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mote, M.I., Goldsmith, T.H.: Spectral sensitivities of color receptors in the compound eye of the cockroach Periplaneta. Journal of Experimental Zoology 173, 137–145 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyer, D.J., Margiotta, J.F., Walcott, B.: The shadow response of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. Journal of Neurobiology 12, 93–96 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tâche, F., Asadpour, M., Caprari, G., Karlen, W., Siegwart, R.: Perception and Behavior of InsBot: Robot-Animal Interaction Issues. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Hong Kong SAR and Macau SAR (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grégory Sempo
    • 1
  • Stéphanie Depickère
    • 2
  • Jean-Marc Amé
    • 1
  • Claire Detrain
    • 1
  • José Halloy
    • 1
  • Jean-Louis Deneubourg
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Social EcologyUniversité Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium
  2. 2.INLASA, Entomologia médicaLa PazBolivia

Personalised recommendations