Self-configuration Via Cooperative Social Behavior

  • Wolfgang Trumler
  • Robert Klaus
  • Theo Ungerer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4158)


The way computer systems are built dramatically changed over time. Starting from huge monolithic systems for many users up to ubiquitous computer environments with a lot of distributed and embedded computing power. Also the way these systems are configured has changed. The Autonomic and Organic Computing initiatives try to solve the upcoming management of complexity problems by utilizing biologically or sociologically inspired methods. One of the demands to the systems is self-configuration.

This paper proposes a self-configuration process for the networked nodes of the AMUN middleware based on a social behavior. Aim of the self-configuration is to find a good distribution of services by calculating a quality of service based on the given resources and the required resources of the services. A configuration specification is provided and flooded into the network to start the cooperative job assignment algorithm. A terminal verification step guarantees the correctness of the found configuration. Evaluations of the completely distributed self-configuration process are provided.


Multiagent System Resource Consumption Object Constraint Language Autonomic Computing Resolution Mechanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American, 94–110 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horn, P.: Autonomic Computing: IBM’s Perspective on the State of Information Technology (2001),
  3. 3.
    VDE/ITG/GI: Organic Computing: Computer- und Systemarchitektur im Jahr 2010 (2003),
  4. 4.
    Trumler, W., Bagci, F., Petzold, J., Ungerer, T.: AMUN - autonomic middleware for ubiquitous environments applied to the smart doorplate. ELSEVIER Advanced Engineering Informatics 19, 243–252 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    OMG: Object Constraint Language (2003),
  6. 6.
    Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents: Standard FIPA specifications (2006), available online:
  8. 8.
    Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., Willmott, S.: Agent Technology Roadmap (2006), available online:
  9. 9.
    Smith, R.G.: The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transaction on Computers 29, 1104–1113 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boutaba, R., Omari, S., Singh, A.: Selfcon: An architecture for self-configuration of networks. International Journal of Communications and Networks (special issue on Management of New Networking Infrastructure and Services) 3, 317–323 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dutta, P.S., Jennings, N.R., Moreau, L.: Adaptive distributed resource allocation and diagnostics using cooperative information sharing strategies. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Hakodate, Japan (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Trumler
    • 1
  • Robert Klaus
    • 1
  • Theo Ungerer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations