Higher Order Pheromone Models in Ant Colony Optimisation

  • James Montgomery
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4150)


Ant colony optimisation is a constructive metaheuristic that successively builds solutions from problem-specific components. A parameterised model known as pheromone—an analogue of the trail pheromones used by real ants—is used to learn which components should be combined to produce good solutions. In the majority of the algorithm’s applications a single parameter from the model is used to influence the selection of a single component to add to a solution. Such a model can be described as first order. Higher order models describe relationships between several components in a solution, and may arise either by contriving a model that describes subsets of components from a first order model or because the characteristics of solutions modelled naturally relate subsets of components. This paper introduces a simple framework to describe the application of higher order models as a tool to understanding common features of existing applications. The framework also serves as an introduction to those new to the use of such models. The utility of higher order models is discussed with reference to empirical results in the literature.


Order Model Travel Salesman Problem Partial Solution Constraint Satisfaction Problem Solution Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zlochin, M., Dorigo, M.: Model-based search for combinatorial optimization: A comparative study. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P.A., Beyer, H.-G., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 651–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Montgomery, J., Randall, M., Hendtlass, T.: Automated selection of appropriate pheromone representations in ant colony optimisation. Artificial Life 11, 269–291 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blum, C.: Theoretical and practical aspects of ant colony optimization. Dissertations in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 282. IOS Press, Nieuwe Hemweg (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blum, C., Sampels, M.: Ant colony optimization for FOP shop scheduling: A case study on different pheromone representations. In: 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1558–1563 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montgomery, E.J.: Solution Biases and Pheromone Representation Selection in Ant Colony Optimisation. Ph.D thesis, Bond University (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stützle, T., Hoos, H.: \(\mathcal{MAX-MIN}\) ant system. Future Gen. Comp. Sys. 16, 889–914 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roli, A., Blum, C., Dorigo, M.: ACO for maximal constraint satisfaction problems. In: 4th Metaheuristics International Conference, Porto, Portugal, pp. 187–192 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solnon, C.: Ants can solve constraint satisfaction problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenet, S., Solnon, C.: Searching for maximum cliques with ant colony optimization. In: Raidl, G.R., Cagnoni, S., Cardalda, J.J.R., Corne, D.W., Gottlieb, J., Guillot, A., Hart, E., Johnson, C.G., Marchiori, E., Meyer, J.-A., Middendorf, M. (eds.) EvoIASP 2003, EvoWorkshops 2003, EvoSTIM 2003, EvoROB/EvoRobot 2003, EvoCOP 2003, EvoBIO 2003, and EvoMUSART 2003. LNCS, vol. 2611, pp. 236–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization for the edge-weighted k-cardinality tree problem. In: Langdon, W. (ed.) Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 27–34. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costa, D., Hertz, A.: Ants can colour graphs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48, 295–305 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schoofs, L., Naudts, B.: Solving CSPs with ant colonies. In: Abstract Proceedings of ANTS 2000, Brussels, Belgium (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ducatelle, F., Levine, J.: Ant colony optimisation and local search for bin packing and cutting stock problems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55, 705–716 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Socha, K., Knowles, J.D., Sampels, M.: A \(\cal{MAX-MIN}\) ant system for the university course timetabling problem. In: Dorigo, M., Di Caro, G.A., Sampels, M. (eds.) Ant Algorithms 2002. LNCS, vol. 2463, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blum, C., Sampels, M.: An ant colony optimization algorithm for shop scheduling problems. J. Math. Model. Algorithms 3, 285–308 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Montgomery
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Information & Communication TechnologiesSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations