Content Is Capricious: A Case for Dynamic System Generation

  • Hans-Werner Sehring
  • Sebastian Bossung
  • Joachim W. Schmidt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4152)


Database modeling is based on the assumption of a high regularity of its application areas, an assumption which applies to both the structure of data and the behavior of users. Content modeling, however, is less strict since it may treat one application entity substantially differently from another depending on the instance at hand, and content users may individually add descriptive or interpretive aspects depending on their knowledge and interests. Therefore, we argue that adequate content modeling has to be open to changes, and content management systems have to react to changes dynamically, thus making content management a case for dynamic system generation.

In our approach, openness and dynamics are provided through a compiler framework which is based on a conceptual model of the application domain. Using a conceptual modeling language users can openly express their views on the domain’s entities. Our compiler framework dynamically generates the components of an according software system. Central to the compiler framework is the notion of generators, each generating a particular module for the intended application system. Based on the resulting modular architecture the generated systems allow personalized model definition and seamless model evolution.

In this paper we give details of the system modules and describe how the generators which create them are coordinated in the compiler framework.


Database Schema Asset Class Intermediate Model Content Management System Dynamic System Generation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aho, A.V., Sethi, R., Ullman, J.D.: Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambler, S.W.: The Object Primer: Agile Model-Driven Development with UML 2.0, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Assmann, U.: Meta-programming Composers In Second-Generation Component Systems. In: Bishop, J., Horspool, N. (eds.) Systems Implementation 2000 – Working Conference IFIP WG 2.4, Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batory, D., Lofaso, B., Smaragdakis, Y.: JTS: Tools for Implementing Domain-Specific Languages. In: Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse, pp. 143–153. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bettin, J.: Model-Driven Software Development: An emerging paradigm for Industrialized Software Asset Development. Technical report, SoftMetaWare (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bossung, S., Sehring, H.-W., Hupe, P., Schmidt, J.W.: Open and Dynamic Schema Evolution in Content-intensive Web Applications. In: Cordeiro, J., Pedrosa, V., Encarnaçãom, B., Filipe, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, WEBIST 2006, pp. 109–116. Insticc Press (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brichau, J.: Integrative Composition of Program Generators. PhD thesis, Vakgroep Informatica, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brodie, M.L., Mylopoulos, J., Schmidt, J.W. (eds.): On Conceptual Modelling: Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence, Databases, and Programming Languages. Topics in Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruhn, M.: The Warburg Electronic Library in Hamburg: A Digital Index of Political Iconography. Visual Resources XV, 405–423 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, P.P.: The Entity-Relationship Model – Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta, G.: A language-centric approach to software engineering: Domain specific languages meet software components. In: Electronic Proceedings of the CoLogNet Area Workshop Series on Component-based Software Development and Implementation Technology for Computational Logic Systems, Technical University of Madrid (September 19-20, 2002) (Spain)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mezini, M., Seiter, L., Lieberherr, K.: Component integration with pluggable composite adapters. In: Software Architectures and Component Technology, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller, J., Mukerji, J.: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. Technical Report omg/2003-06-01, OMG (June 2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, J.W., Sehring, H.-W.: Conceptual Content Modeling and Management. In: Broy, M., Zamulin, A.V. (eds.) PSI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2890, pp. 469–493. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sehring, H.-W., Schmidt, J.W.: Beyond Databases: An Asset Language for Conceptual Content Management. In: Benczúr, A.A., Demetrovics, J., Gottlob, G. (eds.) ADBIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3255, pp. 99–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smaragdakis, Y., Batory, D.: Scoping Constructs for Program Generators. Technical Report CS-TR-96-37, Austin, Texas, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smaragdakis, Y., Huang, S.S., Zook, D.: Program generators and the tools to make them. In: PEPM 2004: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-based Program Manipulation, Verona, Italy, pp. 92–100. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valderas, P., Fons, J., Pelechano, V.: Transforming Web Requirements into Navigational Models: AN MDA Based Approach. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 320–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wiederhold, G.: Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems. IEEE Computer 25, 38–49 (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Werner Sehring
    • 1
  • Sebastian Bossung
    • 1
  • Joachim W. Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Systems Institute (STS)Hamburg University of Science and Technology (TUHH) 

Personalised recommendations