Co-Creation in Ambient Narratives

  • Mark van Doorn
  • Arjen P. de Vries
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3864)


Ambient Intelligence [1] aims to improve the quality of people’s life by making everyday activities more convenient and enjoyable with digital media. Technically, Ambient Intelligence refers to the presence of a digital environment that is sensitive, adaptive, and responsive to the presence of people. Electronic devices are embedded in furniture, clothing or other parts of the environment; the technology recedes into the background of our everyday lives until only the function (i.e., the user interface) remains visible to people. At the same time, the human moves into the center of attention, in control of the devices around him. These work in concert to support the performance of everyday activities in an intelligent manner.


Mass Customization Ambient Intelligence Media Object Mixed Reality Interactive Drama 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aarts, E., Marzano, S., (eds.): The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence. 010 Publishers (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abowd, G., Mynatt, E.: Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7(1), 29–58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arons, B.: Hyperspeech: Navigating in Speech-Only Hypermedia. In: UK Conference on Hypertext, pp. 133–146 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azuma, R.: A Survey of Augmented Reality. In: SIGGRAPH 1995, pp. 1–38 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bates, J., Loyall, A., Reilly, W.: Broad Agents. Sigart Bulletin 2(4), 38–40 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks, K. Metalinear Cinematic Narrative: Theory, Process and Tool. PhD thesis. MIT Media Lab (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 87–129 (1996)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience . Perennial (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DaSilveira, G., Borenstein, D., Fogliatto, F.: Mass Customization, Literature Review and Research Directions. International Journal of Production Economics 72(1), 1–13 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davenport, G., Murtaugh, M.: Automatist Storyteller Systems and the Shifting Sands of Story. IBM Systems Journal 36(3), 446–456 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Bra, P., Houben, G.-J., Wu, H.: AHAM: A Dexter-Based Reference Model for Adaptive Hypermedia. In: UK Conference on Hypertext, pp. 147–156 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falk, J.: Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. In: Interfacing the Narrative Experience. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisk, R., Grove, S.: The Service Experience as Theater. Advances in Consumer Research 19, 455–461 (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, Doubleday (1959)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gronbaek, K., Vestergaard, P., Orbaek, P.: Towards Geo-Spatial Hypermedia: Concepts and Prototype Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Maryland, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Halasz, F., Schwartz, M.: The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. Communications of the ACM 37(2), 30–39 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardman, L., Bulterman, D., Van Rossum, G.: The Amsterdam Hypermedia Model: Adding Time and Context to the Dexter Model. Communications of the ACM 37(2), 50–64 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hull, R., Clayton, B., Melamed, T.: Rapid Authoring of Mediascapes. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stalk Jr., G.: Time - The Next Source of Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review 86(4), 41–51 (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kray, C., Kruger, A., Endres, C.: Some Issues on Presentations in Intelligent Environments. In: Aarts, E., Collier, R.W., van Loenen, E., de Ruyter, B. (eds.) EUSAI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2875, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurel, B.: Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maes, P.: How To Do The Right Thing. Connection Science Journal 1(3), 291–321 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magerko, B.: A Proposal for an Interactive Drama Architecture. In: AAAI 2002 Spring Symposium Series: Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Entertainment (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mateas, M.: An Oz-Centric Review of Interactive Drama and Believable Agents. Tech. rep., School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKee, R.: Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting. Regan Books (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Millard, D., et al.: Hyperdoc: An Adaptive Narrative System for Dynamic Multimedia Presentations. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murray, J.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pine, J., Gillmore, J.: The Experience Economy. Harvard Business School Press (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rivkin, J., Ryan, M.: Literary Theory: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Romero, L., Correia, N.: HyperReal: A Hypermedia Model for Mixed Reality. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Nottingham, UK. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sawhney, N., Balcom, D., Smith, I.E.: HyperCafe: Narrative and Aesthetic Properties of Hypervideo. In: UK Conference on Hypertext, pp. 1–10 (1996)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schechner, R.: Performance Studies: An Introduction. Routledge, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schulze, G.: Die Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Campus (1992)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sinclair, P., Martinez, K., Millard, D., Weal, M.: Links in the Palm of your Hand: Tangible Hypermedia using Augmented Reality. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Maryland, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sohn, T., Dey, A.: iCAP: Rapid Prototyping of Context-aware Applications. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stotts, P., Furuta, R.: Petri-net-based hypertext: document structure with browsing semantics. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 7(1), 3–29 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) W3C standard,
  38. 38.
    Szilas, N.: Interactive Drama on the Computer: Beyond Linear Narrative. In: AAAI 1999 Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence (1999)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Toffler, A.: Future Shock. Bantam Books (1984)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weal, M., Michaelides, D., Tompson, M., De Roure, D.: The Ambient Wood Journals - Replaying the Experience . In: Proceedings of Hypertext 2003, Nottingham, UK (2003)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weiser, M.: The Computer of the 21st Century. Scientific American (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark van Doorn
    • 1
  • Arjen P. de Vries
    • 2
  1. 1.Philips ResearchEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Mathematics and Computer ScienceAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations