The Citizens in E-Participation

  • Henning Sten Hansen
  • Kristian Hegner Reinau
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)


Recent advances in GIS and the Internet have improved the technical possibilities for supporting the public participation through e-Participation systems – e.g. Public Participation GIS. On the other hand there has been too much focus on many technical aspects of public participation with reduced focus on the citizens. Equal opportunities to express their opinions and an open debate between people are the basic foundation for democracy. Therefore the design of participatory processes must take outset in the citizens and their knowledge and commitment concerning the issue to be debated. The current paper presents the results of a survey among actively involved citizens in Northern Jutland County. Our analysis shows a high degree of involvement among middle-age well-educated males with a higher education and income above average. It seems that contrary to the planner’s vision of an open debate among all citizens, the result of a PPGIS service is a debate among a rather limited group.


Nordic Country Public Participation Participatory Process Digital Divide Public Involvement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hansen, H.S., Prosperi, D.: Citizen Participation and Internet GIS - some recent advances (Editorial). Computers Environment and Urban Systems 29, 617–629 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Nations: The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. United Nations, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations: Agenda 21. United Nations, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UN ECE: Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in decisionmaking and access to justice in environmental matters. In: ECE Committee on Environmental Policy, Aarhus, Denmark (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castells, M.: The Power of Identity. Blackwell Publishers, Great Britain (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishers, Great Britain (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlossberg, M., Shuford, E.: Delineating Public and Participation in PPGIS. URISA Journal 16, 15–26 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanoff, H.: Community participation methods in design and planning. J. Wiley Sons., Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Creighton, J.L.: Identifying publics/staff identification techniques. The Institute for Water Resources. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman, R.E.: Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review 22, 34 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal 35, 216–224 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weidemann, I., Femers, S.: Public participation in waste management decision-making: analysis and management of conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials 33, 355–368 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smyth, E.: Would the Internet widen public participation? Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Leeds (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carver, S.: Participation and geographic information: A position paper. In: ESF-NSF Workshop on Access to geographic information and participatory approaches using geographic information, Spoleto (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jackson, L.S.: Contemporary Public Involvement: Toward a Strategic Approach. Local Environment 6, 135–147 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nordic Council of Ministers: Nordic Information Society Statistics 2002. Helsinki (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hansen, H.S., Kristensen, P.N.: Applying Internet Based 3D Visualisation and Priority-game in Public Consultation. In: Proceedings 25th Urban Data Management Symposium, Aalborg, May 14 -17, vol. 98, pp. 10.89–10.98 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henning Sten Hansen
    • 1
  • Kristian Hegner Reinau
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalborg University & National Environmental Research InstituteAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations