Maximizing Knowledge for Program Evaluation: Critical Issues and Practical Challenges of ICT Strategies

  • Sharon S. Dawes
  • Theresa A. Pardo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)


Policy makers and public managers want and need to know how well government programs perform, but few have the information to accurately and continuously evaluate them. Performance measurement and performance-based decisions can be improved by more sophisticated information systems designed to support analysis and decision making. However, such systems demand close and continuing involvement of program staff, attention to programmatic context, and much better understanding of business processes and the data they generate. Through the example of the prototype Homeless Information Management System, this paper highlights how challenging these issues are and how attention to them can lead to useful and usable performance analysis and evaluation systems.


Decision Support System Program Evaluation Homeless People Business Rule Performance Audit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    De Lancer Julnes, P.D., Holzer, M.: Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review 61(6), 693–709 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newcomber, K.E.: Evaluating public programs. In: Perry, J.L. (ed.) Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drucker, P.: Management: tasks, responsibilities, practices. Harper & Row, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson, J.R.: The dual potentialities of performance measurement: the case of the Social Security Administration. Public Productivity and Management Review 23(3), 267–281 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nyhan, R.C., Martin, L.L.: Comparative Performance Measurement: A Primer on Data Envelopment Analysis. Public Performance and Management Review 22(3), 348–364 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flynn, P., Curran, K., Lunne, T.: A decision support system for telecommunications. International Journal of Network Management 12, 69–80 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang, L.Y., Miranda, R.: Dashboards and Scorecards: Executive Information systems for the Public Sector. Government Finance Review (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cloete, F.: Assessing governance with electronic policy management tools. Public Performance and Management Review 26(3), 276–290 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goddard, S., et al.: Geospatial Decision Support for Drought Risk Management. Communications of the ACM 46(1), 35–37 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, S.M., Eom, H.B.: Multiple Criteria Decision Support Systems: The Powerful Tool for Attacking Complex, Unstructured Decisions. Systems Practice 3(1), 51–65 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keen, P., Scott Morton, M.S.: Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon S. Dawes
    • 1
  • Theresa A. Pardo
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Technology in GovernmentUniversity at Albany, SUNYUSA

Personalised recommendations