Advertisement

Digital Capability Assessment for eGovernment: A Multi-dimensional Approach

  • Anthony M. Cresswell
  • Theresa A. Pardo
  • Donna S. Canestraro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)

Abstract

Capability assessment can play an important role in the digital government domain in at least two ways: one is to provide a basis for judging whether agencies are ready to initiate some digital government innovation, and the other is to judge the impact of a digital government initiative in terms of improved capabilities. The problems of how to assess and enhance organizational capability are therefore central to virtually all efforts to improve government performance, particularly in the area of information technology innovation. This paper describes the approach used in developing a set of toolkits for use in assessing capability, with examples from versions developed for use in justice information integration projects and state-level digital preservation planning in the US. The paper includes the theoretical rationale for the design of the toolkits, methods for their use, and implications for use in practice.

Keywords

Strategic Management Journal Organizational Capability Digital Preservation Information System Development Capability Maturity Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Segars, A.H., Grover, V.: Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning. Information Systems Research 10, 199–232 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S.Government Accountability Office, Information Technology Investment Management: A Framework for Assessing and Improving Process Maturity. GAO, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williamson, O.E.: Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 20, 1087–1108 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cresswell, A.M., Pardo, T.A., Canestraro, D.S., Dawes, S.S., Juraga, D.: Sharing Justice Information: A Capability Assessment Toolkit, Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY (November 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pardo, T.A., Cresswell, A.M., Dawes, S.S., Burke, B., Dadayan, L., Embar, S., Kwon, H.: Building State Government Digital Preservation Partnerships: A Capability Assessment and Planning Toolkit, Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY (August 2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyytinen, K., Robey, D.: Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal 9, 85–102 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldstein, H.: Who Killed the Virtual Case File? IEEE Spectrum 42 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Using Technology and Constituting Structure: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 11, 404–428 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lyytinen, K.: Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research. MIS Quarterly 23, 25–27 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luna-Reyes, L.F., Zhang, J., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Cresswell, A.M.: Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: A practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems 14, 93–105 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., Lyytinen, K.: Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge University Press, New York (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boudreau, M.C., Robey, D.: Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective. Organization Science 16, 3–18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richardson, G.B.: The Organization of Industry. Economic Journal 82, 883–896 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Penrose, E.T.: The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helfat, C.E., Raubitschek, R.S.: Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal 21, 961–979 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kogut, B., Zander, U.: What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7, 502–518 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    VandeVen, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota innovation research program. Organization Science 1, 313–385 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pardo, T.A., Cresswell, A.M., Dawes, S.S., Burke, G.B.: Modeling the Social & Technical Processes of Interorganizational Information Integration. Presented at Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barki, H., Rivard, S., Talbot, J.: An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 37–69 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison Wesley, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Averill, E.: Reference Models and Standards. StandardView Archive 2, 96–109 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, New York City (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thompson, M.: Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice. Organization Science 16, 151–164 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levina, N., Vaast, E.: Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 29, 335–363 (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bourdieu, P.: The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1980) (translated 1990) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rose, J., Jones, M.: The Double Dance of Agency: A Socio-Theoretic Account of How Machines and Humans Interact. Systems, Signs & Actions 1, 1937 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shapiro, S.P.: Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 31, 26384 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21, 1105–1121 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S.: Conceptualizing and Measuring Capabilities: Methodology and Empirical Application. Strategic Management Journal 26, 277–285 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cockburn, I.M., Henderson, R.M., Stern, S.: Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1123–1145 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raff, D.M.G.: Superstores and the evolution of firm capabilities in American bookselling. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1043–1059 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosenbloom, R.S.: Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1083–1103 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D., Rowles, C.M.: The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development. Management Science 30, 1674–1689 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Provan, K.G., Milward, B.H.: A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 1–34 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Heclo, H.: A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Brookings Institution, Washington (1977)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang, J.: Expectations and perceptions of benefits and barriers in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance & Management Review (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rethemeyer, R.K.: Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaborative Networks. Public Administration Review 65, 117–121 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pouloudi, A., Whitley, E.A.: Stakeholder Identification in Inter- Organizational Systems: Gaining Insights for Drug Use Management Systems. European Journal of Information Systems 6, 1–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony M. Cresswell
    • 1
  • Theresa A. Pardo
    • 1
  • Donna S. Canestraro
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Technology in GovernmentUniversity at Albany, SUNYUSA

Personalised recommendations