Advertisement

Limits of Public Procurement: Information Systems Acquisition

  • Carl Erik Moe
  • Anne Cathrine Risvand
  • Maung K. Sein
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)

Abstract

In this paper, we identify the tensions that exist inherently in the public procurement process as it applies to the acquisitions of larger information systems. The tensions are a result of government organizations trying to acquire the best information system possible while at the same time having to adhere to public procurement regulations. Based on case analysis of two information system acquisitions in a Norwegian municipality, we uncover three tensions inherent to the procurement process. Our findings reveal that municipalities employ a variety of strategies to deal with these tensions. However, in doing so, new tensions are created. The findings have implications for development of e-Government as these tensions needs to be taken into account when procuring new systems.

Keywords

Public Organization Public Procurement Procurement Regulation Procurement Process Framework Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davila, A., Gupta, M., Palmer, R.: Moving Procurement Systems to the Internet: The Adoption and Use of E-Procurement Technology Models. Eur. Man. J. 21(1), 11–23 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ageshin, E.A.: E-Procurement at Work: A Case Study. Prod. and Inv. Man. 1st. quarter 42(1), 48–53 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henriksen, H.Z., Andersen, K.V.: E-Procurement Adoption: Theory and Practice. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2739, pp. 121–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seong, S.K., Lee, J.Y.: Developing e-Procurement Systems: A Case study on the Government e-Procurement Systems in Korea. Pub. Fin. Man. 4(2), 138–157 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moe, C.E., Henriksen, H.Z., Andersen, K.V.: eProcurement: Love of Life and Overnight Temptations. In: Andersen, K.V., Gronlund, A., Trunmuller, R., Wimmer, M. (eds.) EGOV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3591, pp. 351–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vrday, G.: Public Procurement: Lessons from Three Years’ Experience clarification of key basic principles (1998), http://www.cipe.org/publications/cee/hungary/procurement.htm (October 26,2004)
  7. 7.
    Valen, H.: Ikke fortvil - Forvaltningsnettsamarbeidet hjelper deg og ytterligere hjelp er underveis (1998), http://www.foyen.no/index.cfm?doc=107 (January 15, 2004)
  8. 8.
    Lovells: Public procurement: the expos - the truth behind the headlines! (2002), http://www.lovells.com/control/PublicationControl/pubId/772 (May 17, 2005)
  9. 9.
    Ministry of Trade and Industry. Veileder Forskrift om offentlige anskaffelser (2002), http://odin.dep.no/filarkiv/158061/NOK_Veileder_rev_2002-forskrift_om_offentlige_anskaffelser.pdf (May 17, 2005)
  10. 10.
    Jawad, A.O., Reeves, R.: Successful acquisition of IT systems (2002), http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/sme/rdman/research/students/aj.htm (January 4, 2004)
  11. 11.
    Cegrell, T.: Systems Specification and Requirements Engineering (1998), http://www.enersearch.se/knowledgebase/publications/books/ises/ISES9.pdf (May 5, 2005)
  12. 12.
    Lilley, V.: Managing procurement. Inf. Man. Report 12(9), 16–19 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warsta, J.: Contracting in software business - Analysis of evolving contract processes and relationship (2001), http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514266005/isbn9514266005.pdf (May 1, 2005)
  14. 14.
    Fisher, S., Delbridge, R., Lambert, S.: Harmonising the process of procuring library management systems: a feasibility study (2001), http://www.cerlim.ac.uk/projects/harmonise/harmonise.pdf (May 7, 2005)
  15. 15.
    Bajari, P., Tadelis, S.: Incentive versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. of Economics 32(3), 387–407 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bajari, P., McMillan, R., Tadelis, S.: Auctions versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis (2002), http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swp02007.pdf (May 8, 2005)
  17. 17.
    McCue, C.P., Gianakis, G.A.: Public purchasing: Who’s minding the store? J. of Publ. Procurement 1(1), 71–95 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Statskonsult: The Software Development Agreement - Agreement relating to the development of software (2003), http://www.statskonsult.no/it/ssa/avtaler/ssa-u-en.pdf (May 22, 2005)
  19. 19.
    Statskonsult: The Purchase Agreement - Agreement regarding purchase, licensing and other performances (2003), http://www.statskonsult.no/it/ssa/avtaler/ssa-k-en.pdf (May 22, 2005)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl Erik Moe
    • 1
  • Anne Cathrine Risvand
    • 2
  • Maung K. Sein
    • 1
  1. 1.Agder University CollegeKristiansandNorway
  2. 2.Agresso ASNydalen, OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations