Local Networking for e-Services: A UK Case Study

  • Rony Medaglia
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)


This paper deals with the networking at local level for e-government policies. Focusing on the case of the e-government local partnership in the County of Surrey in the United Kingdom, I analyse the characteristics and the development through time of the networking activity, using the theoretical framework provided by the literature on policy networks. By analysing data collected from primary sources, including focused interviews, I show the changes occurred in the partnership networking for local e-government policy, and point out some independent variables for explaining them. I conclude suggesting new directions of research on the topic.


Local Authority Policy Community Policy Network Electronic Service Issue Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gronlund, A.: State of the Art in E-gov Research - A Survey. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3183. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gronlund, A.: What’s in a Field - Exploring the eGovernment Domain. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lofstedt, U.: E-government - Assessment of Current Research and Some Proposals for Future Directions. International Journal of Public Information Systems 1, 39–52 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatnagar, S.: E-Government. From Vision to Implementation. Sage, New Delhi (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curthoys, N., Crabtree, J.: SmartGov: Renewing Electronic Government for Improved Service Delivery. The Work Foundation, London (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gronlund, A.: Managing Electronic Services. A Public Sector Perspective. Springer, London (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heichlinger, A.: eGovernment in Europe’s Regions: Approaches and Progress in IST Strategy, Organisation and Services, and the Role of Regional Actors. EIPA (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaeger, P.T., Thompson, K.M.: E-government Around the World: Lessons, Challenges, and Future Directions. Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 389–394 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    OECD: OECD E-Government Flagship Report. 27th Session of the Public Management Committee, Chateau de la Muette, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    OECD: e-Government for Better Government. OECD Publishing, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ho, A.T.-K.: Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiative. Public Administration Review 62(4), 434–444 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torres, L., Pina, V., Acerete, B.: E-government Developments on Delivering Public Services Among EU Cities. Government Information Quarterly 22, 217–238 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    European Commission: E-Europe 2005 Action Plan. European Commission, Brussels (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    OECD: The E-government Imperative: Main Findings. OECD Observer (2003), http://www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief
  15. 15.
    Denters, B., Rose, L.E. (eds.): Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fedele, P., Ongaro, E.: A Common Trend, Different Houses: A Comparative Analysis of Devolution in Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Paper presented at the EGPA conference, Bern (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Capocchi, A.: Il processo di e-government nel quadro UE e in particolare la situazionein Gran Bretagna. In: Capocchi, A. (ed.) Il processo di E-government nel sistemadelle amministrazioni pubbliche. Giuffré, Milano (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuk, G.: The Digital Divide and the Quality of Electronic Service Delivery in Local Government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 353–363 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mellor, W., Parr, V.: Government Online: an International Perspective. Taylor Nelson Sofres (2002), unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN007044.pdf
  20. 20.
    Eifert, M.: National E-Government. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferguson, M.: Local E-government in the United Kingdom. In: Druke, H. (ed.) Local Electronic Government: A Comparative Study. Routledge, London (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ODPM: One Year On. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004), http://www.localegov.gov.uk
  23. 23.
    ODPM: Two Years On: Realising the Benefits from our Investment in Egovernment, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005), http://www.localegov.gov.uk
  24. 24.
    Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (DETR): Promoting Egovernment Best Practice in Local Authorities (2001), http://www.odpm.gov.uk
  25. 25.
    Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (DETR): Delivering Local Government Online: Milestones and Resources for the 2005 target (2001), http://www.lga/gov.uk/lga/infoage/deliver2001.pdf
  26. 26.
    Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (DETR): Modern councils, modern services - access for all (2001), http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_localgov/documents/page/odpm_locgov_605195.hcsp
  27. 27.
    Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (DETR): Detailed National E-Local Government Strategy (2001), http://www.odpm.gov.uk
  28. 28.
    Cabinet Office: E-Government: A Strategic Framework for Public Services in the Information Age. Stationery Office, London (2000) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marsh, D. (ed.): Comparing Policy Networks. Open University Press, Buckingham (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marsh, D., Rhodes, R.A.W. (eds.): Policy Networks in British Government. Clarendon, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pratchett, L.: New Technologies and the Modernization of Local Government: An Analysis of Biases and Constraints. Public Administration 77(4), 731–750 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rony Medaglia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Innovation and SocietyUniversity of Rome ‘La Sapienza’RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations