A Review of Quality Dimensions in e-Government Services

  • Xenia Papadomichelaki
  • Babis Magoutas
  • Christos Halaris
  • Dimitris Apostolou
  • Gregoris Mentzas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)


This paper presents a synthetic summary of the literature in the area of quality of e-government services, as a basis for the future construction of a relevant model and ontology. We include 18 different approaches concerning quality of service for public sector in general and e-government more specifically. Using as a criterion the focus of each approach on organizational issues or the front end of the service we classified them in introvert and extrovert ones. As a result of the review we were able to organize the main components influencing quality of e-government services in the following four key areas: service, content, system and organization.


Service Quality Customer Satisfaction Quality Dimension Balance Scorecard American Customer Satisfaction Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Customer Satisfaction Index. The American Customer Satisfaction index - the voice of the nation’s consumer (2006), (Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  2. 2.
    Anbazhagan, M., Nagarajan, A.: Understanding quality of service for web services (2002), IBM Developerworks Web site: (Retrieved January 10, 2006)
  3. 3.
    Baldrige National Quality Program. Criteria for Performance Excellence (2006), from Baldrige National Quality Program Web site , (Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  4. 4.
    CAF Resource Center. Common assessment framework - CAF (2006), from COMMON ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK Web site: (Retrieved January 5, 2006)
  5. 5.
    Cappiello, C., Missier, P., Pernici, B., Plebani, P., Batini, C.: Qos in multichannel IS: the mais approch (2004), (Retrieved January 17, 2006)
  6. 6.
    Cardoso, J., Sheth, A., Miller, J., Arnold, J., Kochut, K.: Modeling quality of service for workflows and web service processes. Journal of Web Semantics (2002), (Retrieved February 06, 2006)
  7. 7.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (1989), (Retrieved March 10, 2006)
  8. 8.
    eGovernment Unit, DG Information Society, European Commission, Top of the web: user satisfaction and usage survey of egovernment services (2004), from Europe’s Information Society Thematic Portal Web site: (Retrieved January 18, 2004))
  9. 9.
    European Public Administration Network. The EPAN contribution to the success of the Lisbon strategy (2005), from European Public Administration Network Web Site: (Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  10. 10.
    ISO. Quality management principles (2006) , from International Organisazion for Standardization Web site: (Retrieved January 19, 2006)
  11. 11.
    Jansen, A., lnes, S.: Quality assessment and benchmarking of Norwegian public web sites. In: Proceeding from European Conference on e-government (2004), (Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  12. 12.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, T.H., Im, K.H., Park, S.-C.: Intelligent measuring and improving model for customer satisfaction level in e-government. In: Wimmer, M.A., Traunmüller, R., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds.) EGOV 2005, vol. 3591, pp. 38–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2005), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, C.S., Wu, S.: Exploring the Impact of Online Service Quality on Portal Site Usage. In: Proceeding of the 35 th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Hawaii, USA (2002), (Retrieved January 10, 2006)
  15. 15.
    Motorola University. The inventors of six sigma (2006a), from Motorola University Web site:,,3079,00.html(Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  16. 16.
    Motorola University. What is Six Sigma (2006b), from Motorola University Web site:,,3088,00.html (Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  17. 17.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: a multipleitem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64 (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Process Quality Associates Inc. How does six sigma work (2001), from Process Quality Associates Web site: (Retrieved March 10, 2006)
  19. 19.
    Sukasame, N.: The development of e-service in thai government. BU Academic Review 3 (2004), (Retrieved January 14, 2006)
  20. 20.
    Sumra, R., Arulazi, D.: Quality of Service for Web Services- Demystification, Limitations, and Best Practices (2003), from Web Services Articles, Tutorials, Discussions, News and other Resources Web site: (Retrieved February 10, 2006)
  21. 21.
    Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.: Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Webb, H.W., Webb, L.A.: Sitequal: an integrated measure of web site quality. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 17 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., Zhou, N.: Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information and Management 42 (2005), (Retrieved February 10, 2006)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xenia Papadomichelaki
    • 1
  • Babis Magoutas
    • 1
  • Christos Halaris
    • 1
  • Dimitris Apostolou
    • 1
  • Gregoris Mentzas
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Management Unit, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, School of Electrical & Computer EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensZografou AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations