e-Participation Behind Closed Doors: Online Evaluation of Teaching Performance

  • Kim Viborg Andersen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4084)


Student involvement in the governance processes has in the case analyzed in this paper incorporated the internet for facilitating qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the teachers’ performances in class. The asynchrony evaluation ensures access, transparency, and accountability at the IT University challenging neo-institutional hypothesis on isomorphism.


Teaching Performance Teaching Evaluation Closed Door Online Evaluation Institutional Challenge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Scott, R.W.: Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DiMaggio, P., Powell, W.W.: The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In: DiMaggio, P., Powell, W.W. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Danziger, J.N., Andersen, K.V.: Impacts of IT on Politics and the Public Sector: Methodological, Epistemological, and Substantive Evidence from the Golden Age of Transformation. International Journal of Public Administration 25(5), 591–627 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Easton, D.: A Systems Analysis of Political Life. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersen, K.V., Danziger, J.N.: Information Technology and the Political World: The Impacts of IT on Capabilities, Interactions, Orientations and Values. International Journal of Public Administration 18(11), 1693–1724 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z.: The First Leg of E-government Research: Domain and Application Areas 1998-2003. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1(4), 26–44 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bretschneider, S.: Information technology, e-government, and institutional change. Public Administration Review 63(6), 738–744 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    King, J.L., Kraemer, K.L.: E-government:Will the Time after Be Any Different (2003), Available from: (cited May 5, 2005)
  9. 9.
    Stamoulis, D., et al.: Revisiting public information management for effective egovernment services. Information Management & Computer Security 9(4), 146 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Affisco, J.F., Soliman, K.S.: E-government: A Strategic Operations Management Framework for Service Delivery. Business Process Management Journal 12(1), 13–21 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallie, W.B.: Essentially Contested Concepts. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 51, pp. 167–198 (1956)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landman, T.: Map-Making and Analysis of the Main International Initiatives on Developing Indicators on Democracy and Good Governance (2002), Available from: (cited December 7, 2003)
  13. 13.
    Lipsky, M.: Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas and the Individual in Public Services. Russel Stage Foundation, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    UNPAN. UN Global E-government Readiness Report 2005(2005), Available from: (cited)
  15. 15.
    Srensen, E.: Brugeren og demokratiet. GRUS (53), 81–96 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoff, J., Horrocks, I., Tops, P. (eds.): Democratic Governance and New Technology. Routledge, London (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rose, J., Sæbø, Ø.: Democracy Squared. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 17(2), 133–168 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weizenbaum, J.: Computer Power and Human Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Viborg Andersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsCopenhagen Business SchoolFredriksberg

Personalised recommendations