Advertisement

Evaluating the Tangible Interface and Virtual Characters in the Interactive COHIBIT Exhibit

  • Michael Kipp
  • Kerstin H. Kipp
  • Alassane Ndiaye
  • Patrick Gebhard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4133)

Abstract

When using virtual characters in the human-computer interface the question arises of how useful this kind of interface is: whether the human user accepts, enjoys and profits from this form of interaction. Thorough system evaluations, however, are rarely done. We propose a post-questionnaire evaluation for a virtual character system that we apply to COHIBIT, an interactive museum exhibit with virtual characters. The evaluation study investigates the subjects’ experiences with the exhibit with regard to informativeness, entertainment and virtual character perception. Our subjects rated the exhibit both entertaining and informative and gave it a good overall mark. We discuss the detailed results and identify useful factors to consider when building and evaluating virtual character applications.

Keywords

Multiagent System Nonverbal Behavior Female Character Speech Synthesis Virtual Character 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rist, T., André, E., Baldes, S., Gebhard, P., Klesen, M., Kipp, M., Rist, P., Schmitt, M.: A review of the development of embodied presentation agents and their application fields. In: Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) Life-Like Characters – Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications, pp. 377–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ndiaye, A., Gebhard, P., Kipp, M., Klesen, M., Schneider, M., Wahlster, W.: Ambient Intelligence in Edutainment: Tangible Interaction with Life-Like Exhibit Guides. In: Maybury, M., Stock, O., Wahlster, W. (eds.) INTETAIN 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3814, pp. 104–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McBreen, H., Anderson, J., Jack, M.: Evaluating 3D embodied conversational agents in contrasting VRML retail applications. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Multimodal Communication and Context in Embodied Agents held in conjunction with the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS), Montréal, pp. 83–87 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruttkay, Z., Pelachaud, C. (eds.): From Brows to Trust: Evaluating Embodied Conversational Agents. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartmann, B., Mancini, M., Buisine, S., Pelachaud, C.: Design and evaluation of expressive gesture synthesis for embodied conversational agents. In: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Mulken, S., André, E., Müller, J.: The Persona Effect: How Substantial is it? In: Proceedings of the British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction (HCI 1998), pp. 53–66 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klesen, M., Kipp, M., Gebhard, P., Rist, T.: Staging exhibitions: Methods and tools for modeling narrative structure to produce interactive performances with virtual actors. Virtual Reality. Special Issue on Storytelling in Virtual Environments 7(1), 17–29 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gebhard, P., Kipp, M., Klesen, M., Rist, T.: Authoring scenes for adaptive, interactive performances. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 725–732 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kipp, M.: Creativity Meets Automation: Combining Nonverbal Action Authoring with Rules and Machine Learning. In: Gratch, J., Young, M., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P. (eds.) IVA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4133, pp. 230–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westermann, R.: Empirical tests of scale type for individual ratings. Applied Psychological Measurement 9, 265–274 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Kipp
    • 1
  • Kerstin H. Kipp
    • 2
  • Alassane Ndiaye
    • 1
  • Patrick Gebhard
    • 1
  1. 1.DFKISaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Experimental Neuropsychology UnitUniversity of the SaarlandSaarbrueckenGermany

Personalised recommendations