Improving Pushdown System Model Checking

  • Akash Lal
  • Thomas Reps
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4144)


In this paper, we reduce pushdown system (PDS) model checking to a graph-theoretic problem, and apply a fast graph algorithm to improve the running time for model checking. Several other PDS questions and techniques can be carried out in the new setting, including witness tracing and incremental analysis, each of which benefits from the fast graph-based algorithm.


Source Node Model Check Regular Expression Incremental Algorithm Incremental Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Balakrishnan, G., Reps, T.: Analyzing memory accesses in x86 executables. In: Duesterwald, E. (ed.) CC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2985, pp. 5–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Maler, O.: Reachability analysis of pushdown automata: Application to model checking. In: Mazurkiewicz, A., Winkowski, J. (eds.) CONCUR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1243, pp. 135–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Touili, T.: A generic approach to the static analysis of concurrent programs with procedures. In: POPL, pp. 62–73 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conway, C.L., Namjoshi, K.S., Dams, D., Edwards, S.A.: Incremental algorithms for inter-procedural analysis of safety properties. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 449–461. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esparza, J., Hansel, D., Rossmanith, P., Schwoon, S.: Efficient algorithms for model checking pushdown systems. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) CAV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 232–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esparza, J., Schwoon, S.: A BDD-based model checker for recursive programs. In: Berry, G., Comon, H., Finkel, A. (eds.) CAV 2001. LNCS, vol. 2102, pp. 324–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finkel, A., Willems, B., Wolper, P.: A direct symbolic approach to model checking pushdown systems. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 9 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kidd, N., Reps, T., Melski, D., Lal, A.: WPDS++: A C++ library for weighted pushdown systems (2005),
  9. 9.
    Kiefer, S., Schwoon, S., Suwimonteerabuth, D.: nMoped (2005),
  10. 10.
    Lal, A., Lim, J., Polishchuk, M., Liblit, B.: Path optimization in programs and its application to debugging. In: European Symposium On Programming, pp. 246–263 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lal, A., Reps, T.: Improving pushdown system model checking. Technical Report 1552, University of Wisconsin-Madison (January 2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lal, A., Reps, T., Balakrishnan, G.: Extended weighted pushdown systems. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 434–448. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsunaga, Y., McGeer, P.C., Brayton, R.K.: On computing the transitive closure of a state transition relation. In: Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 260–265 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Myers, E.W.: A precise interprocedural data flow algorithm. In: POPL, pp. 219–230 (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramalingam, G.: Data flow frequency analysis. In: PLDI, pp. 267–277 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reps, T., Schwoon, S., Jha, S., Melski, D.: Weighted pushdown systems and their application to interprocedural dataflow analysis. Science of Computer Programming (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwoon, S.: Model-Checking Pushdown Systems. PhD thesis, Technical Univ. of Munich, Munich, Germany (July 2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Tarjan, R.E.: Fast algorithms for solving path problems. J. ACM 28(3), 594–614 (1981)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarjan, R.E.: A unified approach to path problems. J. ACM 28(3), 577–593 (1981)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akash Lal
    • 1
  • Thomas Reps
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin 
  2. 2.GrammaTech, Inc 

Personalised recommendations