Advertisement

Towards a Hybrid Navigation Interface: Comparison of a Slice Based Navigation System with In-Situ Visualization

  • Joerg Traub
  • Philipp Stefan
  • Sandro M. Heining
  • Christian Riquarts
  • Tobias Sielhorst
  • Ekkehard Euler
  • Nassir Navab
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4091)

Abstract

Since the introduction of computer aided surgery various visualization methods have proposed for intraoperative navigation. Slice based navigation systems are commercially available and frequently used. These visualize three dimensional data on a two dimensional display as orthogonal slices controlled by the position of a surgical instrument. In-situ visualization was introduced as an alternative approach for intraoperative visualization. This technique visualizes three dimensional imaging data directly on the surgical object via three dimensional display technology. We compare monitor based navigation against video see-through augmented reality visualization. Furthermore, we compare both systems against a hybrid system that we have recently introduced. We created an experimental setup to simulate an exemplary application in trauma and orthopedic surgery, where a drill has to be navigated to a defined target region. We measured the speed and accuracy of three trauma surgeons with different level of experience performing the drilling task. The results show that the combination of both systems into one single user interface comprises the advantages of each system alone. Using the hybrid interface the surgeons performed the task with the accuracy of a standard navigation at the speed of the in-situ visualization.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Target Registration Error Augmented Reality System Augmented Reality Technology Navigation Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    King, A.P., Edwards, P.J., Maurer Jr., C.R., de Cunha, D.A., Hawkes, D.J., Hill, D.L.G., Gaston, R.P., Fenlon, M.R., Strong, A.J., Chandler, C.L., Richards, A., Gleeson, M.J.: A system for microscope-assisted guided interventions. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 19, 1082–1093 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birkfellner, W., Figl, M., Huber, K., Watzinger, F., Wanschitz, F., Hummel, J., Hanel, R., Greimel, W., Homolka, P., Ewers, R., Bergmann, H.: A head-mounted operating binocular for augmented reality visualization in medicine–design and initial evaluation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 21, 991–997 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sauer, F., Khamene, A., Bascle, B., Rubino, G.J.: A Head-Mounted Display System for Augmented Reality Image Guidance: Towards Clinical Evaluation for iMRI-guided Neurosurgery. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 707–716. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azar, F.S., Perrin, N., Khamene, A., Vogt, S., Sauer, F.: User performance analysis of different image-based navigation systems for needle placement procedures. In: Proc. of the SPIE, vol. 5367, pp. 110–121 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wacker, F.K., Vogt, S., Khamene, A., Jesberger, J.A., Nour, S.G., Elgort, D.R., Sauer, F., Duerk, J.L., Lewin, J.S.: An augmented reality system for mr image–guided needle biopsy: Initial results in a swine model. Radiology 238, 497–504 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Traub, J., Stefan, P., Heining, S.M., Sielhorst, T., Riquarts, C., Euler, E., Navab, N.: Stereoscopic augmented reality navigation for trauma surgery: cadaver experiment and usability study. In: Proc. of CARS 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sielhorst, T., Feuerstein, M., Traub, J., Kutter, O., Navab, N.: Campar: A software framework guaranteeing quality for medical augmented reality. In: Proc. of CARS 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sauer, F., Wenzel, F., Vogt, S., Tao, Y., Genc, Y., Bani-Hashemi, A.: Augmented workspace: designing an ar testbed. In: Proc. of IEEE and ACM ISAR, pp. 47–53 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoff, W.A., Vincent, T.L.: Analysis of head pose accuracy in augmented reality. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics 6 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sauer, F., Schoepf, U.J., Khamene, A., Vogt, S., Das, M., Silverman, S.G.: Augmented reality system for ct-guided interventions: System description and initial phantom trials. In: Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vogt, S., Khamene, A., Sauer, F., Niemann, H.: Single camera tracking of marker clusters: Multiparameter cluster optimization and experimental verification. In: Proc. of IEEE and ACM ISMAR, pp. 127–136 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, M.Y., Maurer Jr., C.R., Fitzpatrick, J.M., Maciunas, R.J.: An automatic technique for finding and localizing externally attached markers in ct and mr volume images of the head. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43, 627–637 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gold, S., Rangarajan, A.: A graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 18, 377–388 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Umeyama, S.: Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 376–380 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Traub, J., Stefan, P., Heining, S.M., Sielhorst, T., Riquarts, C., Euler, E., Navab, N.: Hybrid navigation interface for orthopedic and trauma surgery. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4190, pp. 373–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fitzpatrick, J.M., West, J.B., Maurer Jr., C.R.: Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 14, 694–702 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joerg Traub
    • 1
  • Philipp Stefan
    • 1
  • Sandro M. Heining
    • 2
  • Christian Riquarts
    • 2
  • Tobias Sielhorst
    • 1
  • Ekkehard Euler
    • 2
  • Nassir Navab
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP)Technische Universität München (TUM)Garching b. MünchenGermany
  2. 2.Trauma Surgery Department,Klinikum InnenstadtLudwig Maximilian Universität München (LMU)MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations