Knowledge Capability: A Definition and Research Model
Basing on the view of dynamic capacity and knowledge-based view, this paper explores the definition and dimensions of knowledge capability. Differing from previous literature that think knowledge capability is the sum total of the knowledge assets of organizations, this paper defines knowledge capability as including both knowledge assets and knowledge operating capacities. And it is proposed that knowledge capability is dynamic, that is to say it will reconstruct with the changing of the environment. Since there are few empirical studies on the relationship between capability and organization performance, this paper suggests a model for further empirical studies on the impact of knowledge capability on organization performance.
KeywordsTacit Knowledge Research Model Organization Performance Dynamic Capability Strategic Management Journal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Parashar, M., Singh, S.K.: Innovation Capability. IIMB Management Review 17, 115–123 (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., Finkelstein, S.: Leveraging Intellect. Academy of Management Executive 19, 4–5 (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Berger, P., Luckman, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin, New York (1967)Google Scholar
- 10.Tsoukas, H.: The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: a Constructionist Approach. Strategic Management Journal 17, 11–25 (1996)Google Scholar
- 11.Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. Meriam-Webster, Chicago, IL (1981)Google Scholar
- 12.Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Firm Capabilities, Resources and the Concept of Strategy. Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley, CA (1990)Google Scholar
- 13.Allee, V.: The Knowledge Evolution, vol. 53. Zhuhai Publishing House (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.Argyris, C., Schon, D.: Organization Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1978)Google Scholar
- 15.Cohen, D.: Toward a Knowledge Context: Report on the First Annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on Knowledge and the Firm. California Management Review 40, 22–39 (1998)Google Scholar