Object Recognition Using K-Nearest Neighbor in Object Space
Object recognition technologies using PCA(principal component analysis) recognize objects by deciding representative features of objects in the model image, extracting feature vectors from objects in an image and measuring the distance between them and object representation. Given frequent recognition problems associated with the use of point-to-point distance approach, this study adopted the K-nearest neighbor technique(class-to-class) in which a group of object models of the same class is used as recognition unit for the images inputted on a continual input image. However, we propose the object recognition technique new PCA analysis method that discriminates an object in database even in the case that the variation of illumination in training images exists. Object recognition algorithm proposed here represents more enhanced recognition rate to change of illumination than existing methods.
KeywordsObject Recognition Facial Expression Recognition Continual Basis Recognition Unit Extract Feature Vector
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Weng, J., Ahuja, N., Huang, T.S.: Learning recognition and segmentation of 3-D object from 2-D images. In: Proc. of Fourth Int’l Conf. on Computer Vision, May 1993, Berlin, pp. 121–128 (1993)Google Scholar
- 2.Viola, P., Jones, M.: Robust real-time object detection. In: International Conference on Computer Vision (2001)Google Scholar
- 3.Murase, H., Nayar, S.K.: Visual Learning and Recogntion 3-Dobject from appearance. International journal of Computer Vision 14 (1995)Google Scholar
- 4.Arita, D., Yonemoto, S., Taniguchi, R.-i.: Real-time Computer Vision on PC-cluster and Its Application to Real-time Motion Capture. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Bourel, F., Chibelushi, C.C., Low, A.A.: Robust facial expression recognition using a state-based model of spatially localised facial dynamics. In: Proceedings of Fifth IEEE. International Conference on Automatic Face andGesture Recognition, pp. 106–111 (2002)Google Scholar