Model for Negotiating Prices and Due Dates with Suppliers in Make-to-Order Supply Chains

  • Lanshun Nie
  • Xiaofei Xu
  • Dechen Zhan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4088)


This study deals with the problem of supporting negotiation on prices and due dates of multiple orders between a manufacturer and its suppliers in a make-to-order supply chain. A new negotiation agenda with two phases is proposed based on the fact that relationship between the partners is both cooperative and competitive. In the cooperative phase a mediator implementing Simulated Annealing is incorporated to help the manufacturer and the supplier search tentative agreement of due dates which minimizes the total supply chain cost. Then, they adjust the reservation value and aspiration value of price accordingly based on the idea of integrated-utility. They bargain on the price issue using concession based methods in the competitive phase. The proposed negotiation agenda and approach can achieves near-optimal social welfare and reach win-win solution for negotiation agents. Result of a numerical example is reported.


Supply Chain Part Type Price Issue Negotiation Support System Mediator Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gunasekarana, A., Ngai, E.W.T.: Build-to-order supply chain management: a literature review and framework for development. Journal of Operations Management 23, 421–451 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calosso, T., Cantamess, M., Gualano, M.: Negotiation support for make-to-order operations in business-to-business electronic commerce. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 20, 405–416 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, D., Fang, S.C., Hodgson, T.J.: A fuzzy due-date bargainer for make-to-order manufacturing system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics -Part C, Application and Review 28, 492–497 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Hafsi, M., Roland, E.: Negotiating price/delivery date in a stochastic manufacturing environment. IIE Transactions 31, 255–270 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moodie, D.R.: Demand management: the evaluation of price and due date negotiation strategy using simulation. Production and Operation Management 8, 151–162 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, P.A., Kelle, P.: Quantitative support for buyer-supplier negotiation in just-in-time purchasing. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 25–30 (Spring, 1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cakravastia, A., Nakamura, N.: Model for negotiating the price and due date for a single order with multiple suppliers in a make-to-order environment. International Journal of Production Research 40(14), 3425–3440 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cakravastia, A., Takahashi, K.: Integrated model for supplier selection and negotiation in a make-to-order environment. International Journal of Production Research 42(21), 4457–4474 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolish, R.: Integration of assembly and fabrication for make-to-order production. International Journal of Production Economics 68, 287–306 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pruitt, D.: Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, London (1981)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehtamo, H., Hamalainen, R.P.: Interative multiple-criteria methods for reaching Pareto optimal agreement in negotiation. Group Decision and Neogitiation 10, 475–491 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kersten, G.E.: Modeling distributive and integrative negotiations. Review and revised characterization. Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 493–514 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Indest, R.: Multi-issue bargaining with endogenous agenda. Games and Economic Behavior 30, 64–82 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bar-Yam, Y.: Dynamics of Complex Systems, vol. xvi, p. 848. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein, M., Faratin, P.: Negotiating complex contracts. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 111–125 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo, Q., Chen, C.: An interated-utility based optimization in multi-issues negotiation. Journal of Software 15(5), 706–711 (2004)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In: Intelligent Agents VIII. Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, pp. 377–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian learning in negotiation. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 48, 125–141 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision function for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics Autonomous Systems 24(3-4), 159–182 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lanshun Nie
    • 1
  • Xiaofei Xu
    • 1
  • Dechen Zhan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinP.R. China

Personalised recommendations