Advertisement

Autonomous Construction Technology of Community for Achieving High Assurance Service

  • Kotaro Hama
  • Yuji Horikoshi
  • Yosuke Sugiyama
  • Kinji Mori
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4017)

Abstract

In the retail business under the evolving market, the users solicit continuously to utilize the appropriate services based on their preferences and situations. Such requirements can not be satisfied with the conventional centralized system, due to the dynamic changes of user requirements. Autonomous Decentralized Community System (ADCS) has been proposed to realize a system that satisfies such requirements. The system realizes flexibility to cope with dynamic changes in the environment, but since ADCS is a pure decentralized system, the system has no existence that monitors the whole system to maintain timeliness, which is an essential factor for assurance. In this paper, Autonomous Construction Technology is proposed to improve the response time, which integrates and divides a community in order to achieve the optimal size depending on the changes in environment. The effectiveness is verified through simulation.

Keywords

Response Time Service Provider Boundary Node Request Message Receive Message 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ono, T., Ragab, K., Kaji, N., Mori, K.: Service Oriented Communication Technology for Achieving Assuarance. In: International Workshop on Assuarance in Distributed Systems and Networks (ADSN 2002), July 2002, pp. 69–74. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hightower, J., Borriello, G.: Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE Computer 34(8), 57–66 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marmasse, N., Schmandt, C.: Location-Aware Information Delivery with ComMotion. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen, H.-W. (eds.) HUC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1927, pp. 157–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaji, N., Ragab, K., Ono, T., Mori, K.: Service Oriented Community System for Mobile Commerce. In: Proc. of SSGRR 2002 (July 2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mori, K.: Autonomous Decentralized Systems: Concept, Data Field Architecture and Future Trends. In: Proc. of ISADS 1993, March 1993, pp. 28–34 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ono, T., Kaji, N., Horikoshi, Y., Kuriyama, H., Ragab, K., Mori, K.: Autonomous Decentralized Community Construction Technology to Assure Quality of Services. In: Proc. of the 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems (HASE), May 2002, pp. 84–89, 299–305 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ripeanu, M.: Peer-to-Peer Architecture Case Study: Gnutella Network. In: Int’l. Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P2001) (August 2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kotaro Hama
    • 1
  • Yuji Horikoshi
    • 1
  • Yosuke Sugiyama
    • 1
  • Kinji Mori
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations