Advertisement

LATONA: An Advanced Server Architecture for Ubiquitous Sensor Network

  • Chi-Hoon Shin
  • Soo-Cheol Oh
  • Dae-Won Kim
  • Sun-Wook Kim
  • Kyoung Park
  • Sung-Woon Kim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4017)

Abstract

The emerging Ubiquitous Sensor Network (USN) makes connection less datagrams and short event packets get popular. A large number of short term event packets of USN can cause serious problems, such as interrupt handling overhead and context switching overhead. Furthermore, heavy load of the packet security methods needs enough processing power. Then, the more USN develops, the more network overheads would be loaded into host CPU. To solve the problems, we propose a special server component including TOE (TCP/IP Offloading Engine) and H/W IPSec (IP Layer Security) for USN.

Keywords

Sensor Node Packet Size Packet Processing Transport Layer Security Telecommunication Research Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Regnier, G., et al.: TCP Onloading for Data Center Server. IEEE Computer 37(11), 48–58 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Recio, R.J.: Server I/O Networks Past, Present, and Future. In: Proc.ACM SIGCOMM 2003 Workshop, August 2003, pp. 164–178 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Currid, A.: TCP Offloading to the Rescue. Queue 2(2,3), 58–65 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Intel I/O Acceleration Technology, http://www.intel.com
  5. 5.
    Mogul, J.: TCP Offloading Is a Dumb Idea Whose Time Has Come. In: Proc. 9th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, Usenix Assoc. (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, K.: Network I/O Acceleration Technologies. In: Summer Workshop, KISS (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oppliger, R.: Internet and Intranet Security. Artech House, Norwood (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oppliger, R.: Security at the internet layer. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friend, R.: Making the gigabit IPSec VPN architecture secure. IEEE Computer 37, 54–60 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foong, A.P., et al.: TCP Performance Re-Visited. In: ISPASS (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elkeelany, O.: Performance Analysis of IPSec protocol - encryption and authentication. In: ICC 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hifn IPSec Processors, http://www.hifn.com
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Finisar GTX analyzer, http://www.finisar.com
  16. 16.
    Ganesan, D.: Networking issues in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing (July 2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ravi, S., et al.: System Design Methodologies for a Wireless Security Processing Platform. In: DAC 2002, June 10-14 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Intel Corp., Enhancing Security Performance through IA-64 Architecture, http://developer.intel.com/design/security/rsa2000/itanium.pdf
  19. 19.
    Kant, K., Iyer, R., Mohapatra, P.: Architectural Impact of Secure Sockets Layer on Internet Servers. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Design, pp. 7–14 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldberg, A., Buff, R., Schmitt, A.: Secure Server Performance Dramatically Improved by Caching SSL Session Keys. In: ACM Wksp. Internet Server Performance (June 1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Intel Mote Reserch project website, www.intel.com
  22. 22.
    Hempstead, M., Tripathi, N., Mauro, P., Wei, G.-Y., Brooks, D.: An ultra low power system architecture for sensor network applications. In: International Symposium on Computer Architecture (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D.E., Pister, K.S.J.: System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pp. 93–104 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nazhandali, L., Zhai, B., Olson, J., Reeves, A., Minuth, M., Helfand, R., Pant, S., Austin, T., Blaauw, D.: Energy optimization of subthreshold-voltage sensor network processors. In: International Symposium on Computer Architecture (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chi-Hoon Shin
    • 1
  • Soo-Cheol Oh
    • 2
  • Dae-Won Kim
    • 2
  • Sun-Wook Kim
    • 2
  • Kyoung Park
    • 2
  • Sung-Woon Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer & Software EngineeringUniversity of Science and TechnologyDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Server Platform Research TeamElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)DaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations