Advertisement

Design, Implementation, and Experiments on Outdoor Deployment of Wireless Sensor Network for Environmental Monitoring

  • Jukka Suhonen
  • Mikko Kohvakka
  • Marko Hännikäinen
  • Timo D. Hämäläinen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4017)

Abstract

This paper presents the design, implementation, and practical real world experiments of an energy optimized multi-hop wireless sensor network (WSN) targeted at environmental monitoring. The WSN is fully autonomous and consists of energy-efficient and scalable communication protocols and low-power hardware platform. Software tools are developed for configuring and analyzing large scale networks. The network has been deployed in outdoor environment consisting of 20 nodes covering over 2 km2 area. The results show that the multi-hop network works autonomously, reacts to environmental changes, and is able to operate temperatures down to -30 °C. The hardware nodes operating on 433 MHz frequency provide over 1 km communication distances, while still having sufficient throughput and low energy consumption. The deployed nodes had a lifetime of 6 months with a 1600 mAh battery, while generating 4 packets per minute.

Keywords

Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Medium Access Control Cluster Head Network Lifetime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Weilian, S., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 40, 102–114 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batalin, M.A., et al.: Call and response: Experiments in sampling the environment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 25–38 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martinez, K., Hart, J.K., Ong, R.: Environmental sensor networks. Computer 37, 50–56 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reason, J.M., Rabaey, J.M.: A study of energy consumption and reliability in a multi-hop sensor network. Mobile Computing and Communications Review 8, 84–97 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shah, R.C., Rabaey, J.M.: Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 350–355 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hill, J.L., Culler, D.E.: Mica: a wireless platform for deeply embedded networks. IEEE Micro 22, 12–24 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beckwith, R., Teibel, D., Bowen, P.: Report from the field: Results from an agricultural wireless sensor network. Local Computer Networks, 471–478 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szewczyk, R., Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Anderson, J., Culler, D.: An analysis of a large scale habitat monitorin application. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 214–226 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    He, T., et al.: Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile system, pp. 270–283 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jukka Suhonen
    • 1
  • Mikko Kohvakka
    • 1
  • Marko Hännikäinen
    • 1
  • Timo D. Hämäläinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer and Digital SystemsTampere University of TechnologyFinland

Personalised recommendations