Advertisement

Smart Sticky Widgets: Pseudo-haptic Enhancements for Multi-Monitor Displays

  • Malcolm E. Rodgers
  • Regan L. Mandryk
  • Kori M. Inkpen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4073)

Abstract

Multi-monitor systems are becoming increasingly popular as a way for users to expand their display surface to facilitate multitasking. However, users may have difficulty accessing user interface elements on the borders of the displays, accidentally crossing over to neighbouring displays. We present a smart pseudo-haptic technique to enhance boundary widgets in multi-monitor systems. Our technique was compared to current desktop behaviour as well as to two other pseudo-haptic approaches. All three techniques significantly reduced crossover errors; however, our smart sticky technique also significantly reduced the time to acquire targets on the secondary monitor over the other sticky techniques and was strongly preferred by users.

Keywords

Peak Velocity Movement Time Selection Task Target Selection Mouse Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahlstrom, D.: Modeling and improving selection in cascading pull-down menus using Fitts’ law, the steering law and force fields. In: CHI 2005, pp. 61–70 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balakrishnan, R.: Beating” Fitts’ law: Virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(6), 857–874 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Hinckley, K., Gruen, R.: Mouse Ether: Accelerating the Acquisition of Targets Across Multi-Monitor Displays. In: CHI 2004, pp. 1379–1382 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Hinckley, K., Eversole, A.: Snap-and-go: Helping Users Align Objects Without the Modality of Traditional Snapping. In: CHI 2005, pp. 301–310 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blanch, R., Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M.: Semantic Pointing: Improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In: CHI 2004, pp. 519–526 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cockburn, A., Firth, A.: Improving the Acquisition of Small Targets. People and Computers XVII, 181–196 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G., Starkweather, G.: Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. In: Interact 2003, pp. 9–16 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Douglas, S.A., Kirkpatrick, A.E., MacKenzie, I.S.: Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard. In: CHI 1999, pp. 215–222 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 381–391 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grudin, J.: Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. In: CHI 2001, pp. 458–465 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hinckley, K., Cutrell, E., Bathiche, S., Muss, T.: Quantitative Analysis of Scrolling Techniques. In: CHI 2002, pp. 65–72 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutchings, D., Meyers, B., Smith, G., Czerwinski, M., Robertson, G.: Display Space Usage and Window Management Operation Comparisons between Single Monitor and Multiple Monitor Users. Advanced visual interfaces, pp. 32–39 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lécuyer, A., Coquillart, S., Kheddar, A.: Pseudo-Haptic Feedback: Can Isometric Input Devices Simulate Force Feedback? In: IEEE VR2000, pp. 18–22 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lécuyer, A., Burkhardt, J.M., Etienne, L.: Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: The perception of pseudo-haptic textures. In: CHI 2004, pp. 239–246 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mackinlay, J., Heer, J.: Wideband displays: mitigating multiple monitor seams. In: CHI 2004 Ext. Abstracts, pp. 1521–1524 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandryk, R., Rodgers, M., Inkpen, K.: Sticky Widgets: Pseudo-haptic Widget Enhancements for Multi-Monitor Displays. In: CHI 2005 Ext. Abstracts, pp. 1621–1624 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Baudisch, P., Meyers, B., Robbins, D., Smith, G., Tan, D.: Large Display User Experience. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, Special Issue on Large Displays, 44–51 (July/August 2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., Hudson, S.: Making Computers Easier for Older Adults to Use: Area Cursors and Sticky Icons. In: CHI 1997, pp. 266–271 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm E. Rodgers
    • 1
  • Regan L. Mandryk
    • 2
  • Kori M. Inkpen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver

Personalised recommendations