Searching Knowledge CinemaSense as a Case Study in Collaborative Production of a WWW Service in Two Universities

  • Antti Raike
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4061)


In this paper I will present design research carried out between 1999–2004 at the University of Art and Design Helsinki in collaboration with the Classroom Teacher Training Programme for Finnish Sign Language Users of Jyväskylä University, Finland. The aim of the project was to produce an accessible web-based study product, as well as to clarify the sign language students’ deepening of knowledge and conceptualization related to the subject of cinematic expression, as well as their collaboration during the web-based course. The aim of the design research was connected to the general aim of inclusion, for a shared university for all, which adapts flexibly to the needs of different and diverse students. The design research was positioned in the areas of film art and pedagogy. By merging participatory action research and WWW production a collaborative study concept dealing with cinematic expression entitled, CinemaSense, was developed and produced as part of the research work. It can be accessed at The usability and accessibility of the CinemaSense was observed during web-based courses in cinematic expression during 2001, with the help of a concept survey and network-based communication.


Conceptual Change Participatory Action Research Computer Support Collaborative Learning Computer Support Collaborative Learning Deaf Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Collins, A., Joseph, D., Bielaczyc, K.: Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(1), 15–42 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Díaz-Kommonen, L.: Art, Fact, and Artifact production. Design Research and Multidisciplinary Collaboration. Publication series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki A 37. UIAH, Helsinki (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Burger, D., et al. (eds.): ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., Lehtinen, E.: Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nielsen, J.: Designing Web Usability. New Riders, Indianapolis (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Namatame, M., Kitajima, M., Nishioka, T., Fukamauchi, F.: A Prepatory Study for Designing Web-Based Educational Materials for the Hearing-Impaired. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Burger, D. (eds.) ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118, pp. 1144–1151. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W3C – World Wide Web Consortium 2004. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Draft (November 19, 2004),
  8. 8.
    Theofanos, M.F., Redish J.: Guidelines for Accessible–and Usable–Web Sites: Observing Users Who Work With Screenreaders. Interactions, bimonthly publication of the ACM, The Association for Computing, November–December 2003, vol. x.6, pp. 38–51 (2003),
  9. 9.
    Brown, A.L.: Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(2), 141–178 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choo, C.W., Detlor, B., Turnbull, D.: Web Work – Information Seeking and Knowledge Work on the World Wide Web. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raike, A., Laitinen, K., Viikari, T.: Elokuvantaju – CinemaSense (2001),
  14. 14.
    Ladd, P.: Understanding Deaf Culture. In: Search of Deafhood. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins, A.: Toward a Design Science of Education. CTE Technical Report Issue No. 1 (January 1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P.: Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18(1), 32–42 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raike, A.: Löytäjät Elokuvantajua rakentamassa – yhteisöllinen WWW-palvelun tuotanto. Publication series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki A 57. UIAH, Helsinki (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Honkela, T., Leinonen, T., Lonka, K., Raike, A.: Self-Organizing Maps and Constructive Learning. In: Proceedings of ICEUT 2000, International Conference on Educational Uses of Communication and Information Technologies, Beijing, China, August 21–25, 2000, pp. 339–343 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murtonen, M., Merenluoto, K.: Concept maps as a tool for tracing the process of conceptual change – a methodological perspective. In: Proceedings of Third European Symposium on Conceptual Change. A process approach to conceptual change, Turku, Finland, June 26–28, pp. 56–61 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leinonen, T., et al.: FLE3 – Learning Environment. A web-based groupware for computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) (2003),
  21. 21.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn. Springer Series in Information Sciences, vol. 30. Springer, Berlin (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaipainen, M., Koskenniemi, T., Kerminen, A., Raike, A., Ellonen, A.: Presenting data as similarity clusters instead of lists. In: Stephanidis, Constantine 2001. Universal Access in HCI: Towards an Information Society for All, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, London (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kerminen, A., Raike, A., Kaipainen, M.: Self-organizing map browser for database retrieval. Consiglio Nazionale delle Riserche, Istituto di Ricerca sulle Onde Elettromagnetiche. In: Proceedings of 6th ERCIM Workshop, User Interfaces for All, Convitto della Calza, Florence, Italy, October 25–26 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ultsch, A.: Self-organizing Neural Networks for Visualization and Classification. In: Opitz, Lausen, Klar (eds.) Information and Classification, pp. 307–313. Springer, Berlin (1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barabási, A.-L.: Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antti Raike
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Art and DesignHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations