An Alternative Chinese Keyboard Layout Design for Single-Digit Typists

  • Ming-Chung Chen
  • Ting-Fang Wu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4061)


This study designed an alternative Chinese keyboard layout for single-digit typists and evaluated the efficacy of this innovative layout design. The new eight row by five column keyboard layout was designed based on the principles of alternative keyboard design. Eight college students with proficient keyboarding were involved in this study. The repeated measurement experimental design was used to compare the speed and accuracy of keystroke among the four different keyboard patterns: QWERTY, Alternative, Revised-QWERTY, and Random-Alternative. The experimental results indicated that the subjects’ typing speed is fastest when utilizing the QWERTY layout (63.86 symbols/minute), followed by the Alternative (56.02 symbols/minute), Revised QWERTY (53.39 symbols/minute) and the Random-Alternative keyboard (49.94 symbols/minute). There is no significant difference among QWERTY, Alternative, Revised-QWERTY, and Random-Alternative layouts on the subjects’ typing accuracy. The possible causes of the unpredicted results and suggestions for further studies were discussed.


Spinal Cord Injury Chinese Character Spinal Cord Injury Input Method Typing Speed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anson, D., George, S., Gallup, R., Shea, B., Vetter, R.: Efficiency of the Chubon versus the QWERTY keyboard. Journal of Assistive Technology 13, 40–45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, M.C.: The study of teaching individuals with mental retardation to learn Da-Yi input method. Bulletin of Special Education 19, 195–214 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, M.C., Wang, H.P., Wang-Chen, L.C.: Research on teaching Da-Yi Chinese keyboarding by using adaptive input interface. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education, Taipei, vol. 8, pp. 535–541 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chubon, R.A., Hester, M.R.: An enhanced standard computer keyboard system for single-finger and typing-stick typing. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 25(4), 17–24 (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook, A.M., Hussey, S.M. (eds.): Assistive technology: Principles and practice, 2nd edn. Mosby, Baltimore (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hurlburt, M., Ottenbacher, K.J.: An examination of direct selection typing rate and accuracy for persons with high spinal cord injury using QWERTY and default on-screen keyboards. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 29(4), 54–63 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsieh, M.C., Luo, C.H.: Morse code text typing training of a teenager with cerebral palsy using a six-switch Morse keyboard. Technology and Disability 10(3), 169–173 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kroemer, K.H.E.: Keyboards and keying: An annotated bibliography of the literature from 1878 to 1999. Universal Access in the Information Society 1, 99–160 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shih, K.K., Lin, C.C.: A quantitative model for designing keyboard layout. Perceptual and Motor Skill 88, 113–125 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming-Chung Chen
    • 1
  • Ting-Fang Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationNational Chiayi UniversityChiayiTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation CounselNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations