Advertisement

Downloading vs Purchase: Music Industry vs Consumers

  • Supriya Singh
  • Margaret Jackson
  • Jenny Waycott
  • Jenine Beekhuyzen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3919)

Abstract

The music industry argues that unauthorised downloading of music is detrimentally affecting the industry; a breach of copyright that needs to be stopped. The industry has taken many actions to stamp out unauthorised music downloading, including prosecution of peer-to-peer software users for breach of copyright and against peer-to-peer software suppliers for contributory copyright infringement. Industry commentators have questioned this line of reasoning particularly as there is now significant revenue from legal music downloads in the United States and Europe. This paper draws on a qualitative study of music consumers in Australia to show there is not a clear dichotomy between down- loading and purchase. It is more of a continuum. From the users’ perspective, downloading is transformed to the activity of accessing and exploring music. The industry could more fruitfully focus on satisfying this basic aspect of the listening experience in DRM systems in order to work together with their customers.

Keywords

Music Experience Music Industry Record Company Digital Music Free Download 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, C.: The long tail, Wired (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BBC_News. George Michael shuns music industry. London, BBC (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dufft, N., Stiehler, A., Vogeley, D., Wichmann, T.: Digital Music Usage and DRM: Results from an European Consumer Survey, The Informed Dialogue about Consumer Acceptability of DRM Solutions in Europe (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duncan, C., Barker, E., Douglas, P., Morrey, M., Waelde, C.: Digital Rights Management: Final Report. Study carried out by Intrallect Ltd. on behalf of JISC. Joint Information Systems Committee (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebare, S.: Digital music and subculture: Sharing files, sharing styles. First Monday 9(2) (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horrigan, J.B., Schement, J.R.: Dancing with Napster: Predictable consumer behavior in the new digital economy. IT& Society 1(2), 142–160 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ian, J.: The Internet debacle: An alternative view Performing Songwriter Magazine (2002), http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html
  9. 9.
    IFPI. IFPI: 2005 Digital Music Report, International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, London (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson, M., Singh, S., Waycott, J., Beekhuyzen, J.: DRMs, Fair Use and Users Experience of Sharing Music. In: 5th ACM Workshop on Digital Rights Management, Alexandria, VA, US (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, Q., Safavi-Naini, R., Sheppard, N.P.: Digital rights management for content distribution. In: Weckert, J. (ed.) 2nd Australian Institute of Computer Ethics Conference (AICE 2000), Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Canberra (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Livingstone, S.: Young People and New Media. Sage Publications, London (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madden, M.: Artists, Musicians and the Internet, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morse, J.M., Richards, L.: Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oberholzer, F., Strumpf, K.: The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis. Harvard Business School, UNC, Chapel Hill (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Out-Law, N.: 963 file sharers sued in Europe and Asia, out-law.com legal news (April 12, 2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, S., Zic, J., Satchell, C., Bartolo, K.C., Snare, J., Fabre, J.: A reflection on translation issues in user-centred design. In: Khalid, H.M., Helander, M.G., Yeo, A.W. (eds.) Work with Computing Systems 2004, Damai Sciences, Kuala Lumpur (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sirotic, D.: Striking a ‘digital’ chord: How teenagers use online filesharing networks as part of music and internet consumption School of Applied Communication. RMIT UNIVERSITY, Melbourne (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vredenburg, K.: Increasing ease of use: Emphasizing organisational transformation, process integration, and method optimization. Communications of the ACM 42(5), 67–71 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Supriya Singh
    • 1
  • Margaret Jackson
    • 1
  • Jenny Waycott
    • 1
  • Jenine Beekhuyzen
    • 2
  1. 1.RMIT/SITCRCMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Griffith University/SITCRCBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations