Nonambiguous Concept Mapping in Medical Domain
Automatic annotation of medical texts for various natural language processing tasks is a very important goal that is still far from being accomplished. Semantic annotation of a free text is one of the necessary steps in this process. Disambiguation is frequently attempted using either rule-based or statistical approaches to semantical analysis. A neurocognitive approach for a nonambiguous concept mapping is proposed here. Concepts are taken from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) collection of ontologies. An active part of the whole semantic memory based on these concepts forms a graph of consistent concepts (GCC). The text is analyzed by spreading activation in the network that consist of GCC and related concepts in the semantic network. A scoring function is used for choosing the meaning of the concepts that fit in the best way to the current interpretation of the text. ULMS knowledge sources are not sufficient to fully characterize concepts and their relations. Annotated texts are used to learn new relations useful for disambiguation of word meanings.
KeywordsSemantic Memory Semantic Network Semantic Priming Word Sense Disambiguation Consistent Concept
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.UMLS Knowledge Server web site, http://umlsks.nlm.nih.gov
- 2.MetaMap web site: http://mmtx.nlm.nih.gov
- 3.Stevenson, M.: Word Sense Disambiguation: The Case for Combinations of Knowledge Sources. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL (2003)Google Scholar
- 6.Szymanski, J., Sarnatowicz, T., Duch, W.: Towards Avatars with Artificial Minds: Role of Semantic Memory. Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Intelligence (in print)Google Scholar
- 8.Anderson, J.R.: Learning and Memory. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1995)Google Scholar
- 16.Lehmann, F. (ed.): Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
- 17.Duch, W.: Computational Creativity. In: World Congres on Computational Intelligence, Vancouver July 16-21 (2006)Google Scholar
- 18.Burgess, C.: Representing and resolving semantic ambiguity: A contribution from high-dimensional memory modeling. In: Gorfein, D.S. (ed.) On the Consequences of Meaning Selection: Perspectives on Resolving Lexical Ambiguity, APA Press (2001)Google Scholar
- 19.Rindflesch, T.C., Aronson, A.R.: Semantic processing for enhanced access to biomedical knowledge. In: Kashyap, V., Shklar, L. (eds.) Real World Semantic Web Applications, pp. 157–172. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
- 20.Tree-Tagger web site: http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de//projekte/corplex/TreeTagger/DecisionTreeTagger.html
- 21.Rocha, C., Schwabe, D., Aragao, M.P.: A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web Source. In: International World Wide Web Conference archive Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- 22.AJAX Sun web site http://developers.sun.com/channel/01_06/index.jsp?cid=59754