Nonambiguous Concept Mapping in Medical Domain

  • Paweł Matykiewicz
  • Włodzisław Duch
  • John Pestian
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4029)


Automatic annotation of medical texts for various natural language processing tasks is a very important goal that is still far from being accomplished. Semantic annotation of a free text is one of the necessary steps in this process. Disambiguation is frequently attempted using either rule-based or statistical approaches to semantical analysis. A neurocognitive approach for a nonambiguous concept mapping is proposed here. Concepts are taken from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) collection of ontologies. An active part of the whole semantic memory based on these concepts forms a graph of consistent concepts (GCC). The text is analyzed by spreading activation in the network that consist of GCC and related concepts in the semantic network. A scoring function is used for choosing the meaning of the concepts that fit in the best way to the current interpretation of the text. ULMS knowledge sources are not sufficient to fully characterize concepts and their relations. Annotated texts are used to learn new relations useful for disambiguation of word meanings.


Semantic Memory Semantic Network Semantic Priming Word Sense Disambiguation Consistent Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    UMLS Knowledge Server web site,
  2. 2.
    MetaMap web site:
  3. 3.
    Stevenson, M.: Word Sense Disambiguation: The Case for Combinations of Knowledge Sources. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edmonds, P., Kilgarriff, A.: Introduction to the special issue on evaluating word sense disambiguation systems. Journal of Natural Language Engineering 8(4), 279–291 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pestian, J.P., Itert, L., Andersen, C., Duch, W.: Preparing Clinical Text for Use in Biomedical Research. Journal of Database Management 17(2), 1–11 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szymanski, J., Sarnatowicz, T., Duch, W.: Towards Avatars with Artificial Minds: Role of Semantic Memory. Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Intelligence (in print)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duch, W., Szymanski, J., Sarnatowicz, T.: Concept description vectors and the 20 question game. In: Klopotek, M.A., Wierzchon, S.T., Trojanowski, K. (eds.) Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining. Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, J.R.: Learning and Memory. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mcnamara, T.P.: Semantic Priming; Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition (Essays in Cognitive Psychology). Psychology Press, UK (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pulvermüller, F.: The Neuroscience of Language. On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge Uni. Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hecht-Nielsen, R.: Cogent confabulation. Neural Networks 18(2), 111–115 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 240–247 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Collins, A.M., Loftus, E.F.: A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Reviews 82, 407–428 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McClelland, J.L., Rogers, T.T.: The Parallel Distributed Processing Approach to Semantic Cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4, 310–322 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sowa, J.F. (ed.): Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehmann, F. (ed.): Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duch, W.: Computational Creativity. In: World Congres on Computational Intelligence, Vancouver July 16-21 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burgess, C.: Representing and resolving semantic ambiguity: A contribution from high-dimensional memory modeling. In: Gorfein, D.S. (ed.) On the Consequences of Meaning Selection: Perspectives on Resolving Lexical Ambiguity, APA Press (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rindflesch, T.C., Aronson, A.R.: Semantic processing for enhanced access to biomedical knowledge. In: Kashyap, V., Shklar, L. (eds.) Real World Semantic Web Applications, pp. 157–172. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Rocha, C., Schwabe, D., Aragao, M.P.: A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web Source. In: International World Wide Web Conference archive Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paweł Matykiewicz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Włodzisław Duch
    • 1
    • 3
  • John Pestian
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsNicolaus Copernicus UniversityToruńPoland
  2. 2.Dept. of Biomedical InformaticsCincinnati Children’s Hospital, Medical CenterUSA
  3. 3.School of Computer EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations