Lossless Compression of Digital Mammograms

  • R. Visser
  • L. Oostveen
  • N. Karssemeijer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4046)


The file size of images generated using digital mammography systems varies between 8 MB and 50 MB. The amount of data to be stored in digital screening programs is huge. Image compression may be helpful. In this study 8491 digital and digitised mammography images are compressed using 14 lossless compression schemes. The results show that using lossless image compression, the total amount of data to be stored can be reduced by a factor of 1.3 to 6.9 without loss of image quality. The actual data reduction depends strongly on the selected compression algorithm and the systems used to acquire and process the mammograms. The JPEG-LS and JPEG 2000 algorithms, both included in the DICOM standard, prove to be promising algorithms for screening programs because of the high compression ratios.


Compression Ratio Image Compression Compression Algorithm Digital Mammography Lossy Compression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Przelaskowski, A.: Compression of mammograms for medical practise. In: 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 249–253 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clunie, D.: Lossless Compression of Grayscale Medical Images – Effectiveness of Traditional and State of the Art Approaches. In: Proc. SPIE (Medical Imaging), vol. 3980 (February 2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perlmutter, S.M., et al.: Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms. Signal Processing 59, 189–210 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kivijärvi, J., et al.: A comparison of lossless compression methods for medical images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 22, 323–339 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NEMA Standards Publication PS 3.5, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 5: Data Structures and Encoding, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO/IS 10918-1, Digital compression and coding of continuous-tone still images: Requirements and guidelines (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IS 14495-1, Lossless and near-lossless compression of continuous-tone still images- baseline (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO/IS 15444-1, JPEG 2000 image coding system - Core coding system (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Visser
    • 1
  • L. Oostveen
    • 1
  • N. Karssemeijer
    • 1
  1. 1.National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer ScreeningRadboud University, Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations