Experimental Investigation of the Necessity for Extra Flat Field Corrections in Quality Control of Digital Mammography

  • Paula Pöyry
  • Federica Zanca
  • Hilde Bosmans
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4046)


The purpose of this work was to investigate whether extra flat field corrections should be applied prior to the calculations of quality control quantities and whether there are necessary precautions regarding flat fielding in digital mammography. Effects from using one standard flat field correction for all imaging situations or absence of correction procedures were examined using homogenous PMMA slabs. Differences in field profiles for various exposure geometries and breast thicknesses were quantified. For three systems the maximal deviation of averaged pixel values (along a profile of ROIs parallel to the chest wall) varied from 1.3 % to 6.8 % over the whole image and from 0.6 % to 2.6 % if the analysis is limited to the central part. Extra flat field corrections are not necessary for most applications. If required, the corrections should be performed from images acquired with the same manual exposure and not after a time gap.


Chest Wall Digital Mammography Flat Field Complete Profile Digital Mammography System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Handbook of Medical Imaging, vol. 1. Physics and Psychophysics. In: Beutel, J., et. al.(eds.) SPIE, Bellingham, WA (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saunders Jr., R.S., Samei, E., Jesneck, J.L., Lo, J.L.: Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector. Med. Phys. 32, 588–599 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abramoff, M.D., Magelhaes, P.J., Ram, S.J.: Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11, 36–42 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mammomat Novation DR Users Manual, Siemens AG (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Pöyry
    • 1
  • Federica Zanca
    • 2
  • Hilde Bosmans
    • 2
  1. 1.Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority – STUKHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Leuven University Centre of Medical Physics in Radiology, Department of RadiologyUniversity HospitalsLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations