Evaluation of Effects of HRT on Breast Density

  • Styliani Petroudi
  • Kostantinos Marias
  • Michael Brady
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4046)


Breast density segmentation and classification methods are combined to enable the automatic and quantitative comparison of temporal mammograms of women using Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). The results are based on registration and density quantification, so that potentially the clinician may be informed about substantial localised breast density changes. The measures use texture based density segmentation as well as a normalized representation of mammograms.


Hormone Replacement Therapy Mammographic Density Breast Density Digital Mammography Breast Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 362, 419–427 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marias, K., Behrenbruch, C.P., Highnam, R.P., Brady, J.M., Parbhoo, S., Seifalian, A.: Assessing the role of quantitative analysis of mammograms in describing breast density changes in women using hrt. In: International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 547–551 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Highnam, R., Brady, M.: Mammographic Image Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petroudi, S., Kadir, T., Brady, M.: Automatic classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns: A statistical approach. In: Proceedings of EMBC, International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp. 798–801. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petroudi, S.: Texture in Mammographic Image Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Varma, M., Zisserman, A.: Classifying images of materials: Achieving viewpoint and illumination independence. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 255–271 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E.: Pattern Classificaton and Scene Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petroudi, S., Marias, K., English, R., Adams, R., Brady, M.: Classification of mammogram patterns using area measurements and the standard mammogram form (SMF). In: Medical Imaging Understanding and Analysis, pp. 197–200 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petroudi, S., Brady, M.: Textons contours and regions for improved mammogram registration. In: Seventh International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Medical Physics Publishing (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evertsz, C.J.G., Bodicker, A., Bohnenkamp, S., Dechow, D., Beck, C., Peitgen, H.-O., Berger, L., Weber, U., Jurgens, H., Hendriks, C.L., Karssemeijer, N., Brady, M.: Soft-copy reading environment for screening mammography - screen. In: Yaffe, M. (ed.) Fifth International Workshop in Digital Mammogrphy, pp. 566–572 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Styliani Petroudi
    • 1
  • Kostantinos Marias
    • 2
  • Michael Brady
    • 1
  1. 1.Wolfson Medical Vision LaboratoryOxford UniversityOxfordUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceFoundation for Research and TechnologyHellas

Personalised recommendations