Advertisement

Development of Breast Ultrasound CAD System for Screening

  • Daisuke Fukuoka
  • Yuji Ikedo
  • Takeshi Hara
  • Hiroshi Fujita
  • Etsuo Takada
  • Tokiko Endo
  • Takako Morita
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4046)

Abstract

Mass screening of breast cancer utilizing mammography (MMG) has been widely carried out. However, MMG might not be able to depict small impalpable masses in dense breast tissue clearly. We have developed a computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme in whole breast ultrasound (US) system for mass screening which has been developed by ALOKA CO., LTD., Japan. Our CAD scheme and image processing techniques have the following three benefits.
  1. 1

    Indication of mass candidates by our CAD scheme.

     
  2. 2

    Visualization of breast US images in two views of B-planes (CC View and ML View) and C-plane.

     
  3. 3

    Comparison of left and right breast images as in MMG.

     
The performance of the CAD scheme in detecting malignant masses on an initial study has a true positive fraction of 0.91 (10/11) at a 0.69 (633/924) false positive per image. Although mass screening utilizing US was not appropriate because images acquired by conventional hand probe were poor in reproduction, the problem could be solved in our system.

Keywords

Mass Screening Breast Masse Breast Ultrasound Canny Edge Detector Malignant Mass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [KH1]
    Horsch, K., Giger, M.L., Venta, L.A., Vyborny, C.J.: Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med. Phys. 28, 1652–1659 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [KD1]
    Drukker, K., Giger, M.L., Horsch, K., Kupinski, M.A., Vyborny, C.J.: Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. Med. Phys. 29, 1438–1446 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [KD2]
    Drukker, K., Giger, M.L., Vyborny, C.J., Mendelson, E.B.: Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad. Radiol. 11, 526–535 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [MK1]
    Kupinski, M.A., Giger, M.L.: Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 510–517 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [KH2]
    Horsch, K., Giger, M.L., Venta, L.A., Vyborny, C.J.: Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med. Phys. 29, 157–164 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [RC1]
    Chang, R.F., Chang-Chien, K.C., Chen, H.J., Chen, D.R., Takada, E., Moon, W.K.: Whole breast computer-aided screening using free-hand ultrasound, Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. In: Lemke, H.U., Inamrua, K., Doi, K., Vannier, M.W., Farman, A.G. (eds.) Proc. CARS 2005, pp. 1075–1080 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. [YH1]
    Huang, Y.L., Chen, D.R.: Watershed segmentation for breast tumor in 2-D sonography. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 30, 625–632 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [DC1]
    Chen, D.R., Chang, R.F., Chen, C.J., Ho, M.F., Kuo, S.J., Chen, S.T., Huang, S.J., Moon, W.K.: Classification of breast ultrasound images using fractal feature. Journal of Clinical Imaging 29, 235–245 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [DF1]
    Fukuoka, D., Hara, T., Fujita, H., Endo, T., Kato, Y.: Automated dtection and classification of masses on breast ultrasonograms and its 3D imaging technique. In: 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Proc. IWDM 2000, pp. 182–188 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. [TH1]
    Hara, T., Fukuoka, D., Fujita, H., Endo, T., Kato, Y.: Development of CAD system for 3D breast ultrasound images. In: 6th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Proc. IWDM 2002, pp. 368–371 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. [RE1]
    Ehrich, R.W.: A symmetric hysterisis smoothing algorithm that preserves principal features. CGIP8, 121–126 (1978)Google Scholar
  12. [JC1]
    Canny, J.F.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 9, 679–698 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [LV1]
    Vincent, L., Soille, P.: Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 583–598 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisuke Fukuoka
    • 1
  • Yuji Ikedo
    • 2
  • Takeshi Hara
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Fujita
    • 2
  • Etsuo Takada
    • 3
  • Tokiko Endo
    • 4
  • Takako Morita
    • 5
  1. 1.Technology Education, Faculty of EducationGifu UniversityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Intelligent Image Information, Division of Regeneration and Advanced Medical Science, Graduate School of MedicineGifu UniversityJapan
  3. 3.Division of Medical Ultrasonics, Center of Optical MedicineDokkyo University School of MedicineJapan
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyNational Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical CenterJapan
  5. 5.Department of Mammary GlandChunichi HospitalJapan

Personalised recommendations