Skip to main content

Using a Homogeneity Test as Weekly Quality Control on Digital Mammography Units

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNIP,volume 4046)

Abstract

In the Netherlands a number of (screening) trials with digital mammography equipment have been started since 1999. In this paper results from the weekly QC procedure are given. It seems that the homogeneity test as described in the addendum to the European protocol is able to detect detector problems and flat field calibration problems. However, visual inspection remains necessary. For the CR system in the trials the homogeneity test did not find many problems. Either the homogeneity test is not effective and other tests might be more appropriate or this CR system does not have relevant image quality variations and therefore might not require weekly quality control.

Keywords

  • Digital Mammography
  • Homogeneity Test
  • Image Receptor
  • Flat Field
  • Homogeneity Image

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Engen, R., Young, K., Bosmans, H., Thijssen, M.: Addendum on digital mammography to chapter 3 of: European guidelines for Quality assurance in mammography screening, version 1.0, Euref (2002), http://www.euref.org

  2. Oostveen, L.J., van Engen, R.E., Visser, R., Thijssen, M.A.O.: Technical quality control in digital mammography. In: Pisano, E. (ed.) Proceedings IWDM 2004, Chapel Hill (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, B., Zhao, W.: Temporal performance of amorphous selenium mammography detectors. Medical Physics 32(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siewerdsen, J.H., Jaffray, D.A.: Spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager. Medical Physics 26(8), 1624–1641 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasap, S.O., Rowlands, J.A.: Review X-ray photoconductors and stabilized a-Se for direct conversion digital flat panel X-ray image-detectors. Journal of materials science: materials in electronics (11), 179–198 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Engen, R.E., Swinkels, M.M.J., Oostveen, L.J., Geertse, T.D., Visser, R. (2006). Using a Homogeneity Test as Weekly Quality Control on Digital Mammography Units. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35625-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35627-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics