Skip to main content

Image Similarity and Asymmetry to Improve Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4046))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An improved image similarity method is introduced to recognize breast cancer, and it is incorporated into a computer-aided breast cancer detection system through Bayes Theorem. Radiologists can use the differences between the left and right breasts, or asymmetry, in mammograms to help detect certain malignant breast cancers. Image similarity is used to determine asymmetry using a contextual and then a spatial comparison. The mammograms are filtered to find the most contextually significant points, and then the resulting point set is analyzed for spatial similarity. We develop the analysis through a combination of modeling and supervised learning of model parameters. This process correctly classifies mammograms 84% of the time, and significantly improves the accuracy of a computer-aided breast cancer detection system by 71%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 1999-2000. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Linda, J., Burhenne, W., Wood, S.A., D’Orsi, C.J., Feig, S.A., Kopans, D.B., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., Sickles, E.A., Tabar, L., Vyborny, C.J., Castellino, R.A.: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215, 554–562 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freer, T.W., Ulissey, M.J.: Screening mammography with computer- aided detection. Radiology 220, 781–786 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrari, R.J., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L., Frere, A.F.: Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 20(9) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Astley, S., Mistry, T., Boggis, C.R.M., Hillier, V.F.: Should we use humans or a machine to pre-screen mammograms? In: Proc. of the Sixth Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 476–480 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Astley, S., Gilbert, F.J.: Computer-aided detection in mammography. Clinical Radiology 59, 390–399 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tahmoush, D.A., Samet, H.: Using image similarity and asymmetry to detect breast cancer. In: Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., vol. 6144 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soffer, A., Samet, H.: Pictorial queries by image similarity. In: Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, vol. 3, pp. 114–119 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gudivada, V., Raghavan, V.: Design and evaluation of algorithms for image retrieval by spatial similarity. ACM Trans. on Inf. Sys. 13(2), 115–144 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Naqa, I., Yang, Y., Galatsanos, N.P., Nishikawa, R.M., Wernick, M.N.: A similarity learning approach to content based image retrieval: application to digital mammography. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 23(10), 1233–1244 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberger, J., Gordon, S., Greenspan, H.: An efficient image similarity measure based on approximations of kl-divergence between two gaussian mixtures. In: Proc. of the Ninth IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 487–493 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swett, H.A., Miller, P.L.: Icon: a computer-based approach to differential diagnosis in radiology. Radiology 163, 555–558 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guimond, A., Subsol, G.: Automatic mri database exploration and applications. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 11(8), 1345–1365 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heath, M.D., Bowyer, K.W.: Mass detection by relative image intensity. In: The Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Digital Mammography, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sajda, P., Spense, C., Parra, L.: Capturing contextual dependencies in medical imagery using hierarchical multi-scale models. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Symp. on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 165–168 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kalman, B.L., Kwasny, S.C., Reinus, W.R.: Diagnostic screening of digital mammograms using wavelets and neural networks to extract structure. Technical Report 98-20, Washington University (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lui, S., Babbs, C.F., Delp, E.J.: Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 6, 874–884 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Campanini, R., Bazzani, A., Bevilacqua, A., Bollini, D., Dongiovanni, D., Iampieri, E., Lanconelli, N., Riccardi, A., Roffilli, M., Tazzoli, R.: A novel approach to mass detection in digital mammography based on support vector machines. In: Proc. of the 6th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, P., Astley, S.: Detection of breast asymmetry using anatomical features. In: Proc. of the Int. Society for Optical Engineering Conf. on Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization, vol. 1905, pp. 433–442 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wirth, M.A., Jennings, A.: A nonrigid-body approach to matching mammograms. In: Proc. of the IEEE Image Processing and its Applications, pp. 484–487 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yin, F.F., Giger, M.L., Doi, K., Metz, C.E., Vyborny, C.J., Schmidt, R.A.: Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Medical Physics 18, 955–963

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gondra, I., Heisterkamp, D.R.: Learning in region-based image retrieval with generalized support vector machines. In: Proc. of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p. 149 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heath, M.D., Bowyer, K.W., Kopans, D., et al.: Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. In: Digital Mammography, pp. 457–460. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dettling, M., Buhlmann, P.: Boosting for tumor classification with gene expression data. Bioinformatics 19(9), 1061–1069 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tahmoush, D., Samet, H. (2006). Image Similarity and Asymmetry to Improve Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35625-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35627-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics